its now being revealed that a coalition govt next year would be much worse than the current one.
They would need to resurrect Jim Cairns to do that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
its now being revealed that a coalition govt next year would be much worse than the current one.
A well written article. If al the facts are correct we have one of the lowest levels of upper and middle class welfare in the OECD. Not much Joe or anyone can play around with. To make the cuts he's suggesting would have the governing party booted at the very next opportunity and kept in the wilderness for a while.
http://mattcowgill.wordpress.com/20...romised-the-end-of-the-australian-safety-net/
In all the praise of coalition governments, its hardly ever mentioned that for them, ecomomics is all about winning elections.
Good in theory, just a shame that Howard's middle class welfare is one of they key drivers of that sense of entitlement
Sort of. The problem is middle class welfare is not a zero sum game. There's hundreds of millions wasted on administration and time wasted by people to do all the paper work.Welfare is giving money to people who don't earn very much and pay no tax.
Giving some money back to people who work is tax relief.
There is a big difference between a sense of entitlement - that the government should pay people passive welfare for long periods - and workers being genuinely entitled to receive most of what they have earned.
On the same day that Bob Brown stepped down, there was something else in the news that slipped under the radar.
Greens Senator Rachel Siewert is pushing for an increase in the "Newstart Allowance". She's trying to live off the money others would recieve from centrelink.
A tried and true political stunt.
Anyway, there was something that caught my eye in the news coverage of this.
http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/po...y-for-many-greens-senator-20120413-1wxgz.html
If you are able bodied and of sound mind, how can you justify being on Newstart for 5 years? And there's so many of them.
Surely after 5 years you can be considered out of the workforce and not actively seeking work.
You haven't paid a cent for my kids. But trust me, you should be encouraging people like me to breed.
I think we're at the point where anyone who is on the dole for 5 years must be just about genuinely unemployable. National unemployment levels have been around the 5-6% range for the last few years. I'm wondering how many of these long term unemployed are not of sound mind and body - I wonder if these are people with intellectual or social problems that just don't fit in - what's become of the slow learners class when they left school.
There is also a culture of the generation-pass-on-down syndrome of welfare dependency that has grown over the last 20 years or so.
For what it's worth i commend Joe Hockey for saying what he believes in.
Hes mainly saying that your grandparents, parents, kids and grand kids should pay for your education, your health care and your retirement, depending what stage you are in life.
Which party brought in superannuation again ?
Maybe tomorrow Hockey should also state that aussies are wrong to feel entitled to: :
--a share of Mineral wealth whan clearly thats owned by mining magnates
--To tell refugees fobugger off when we have a legal obligation to settle some her
Looking forward to that
I really don't get how he will make welfare cuts anyway.
You could certainly get some people off the dole but we are already only a couple of percent away from full employment. You can't cut the dole either because it is already hard for many to live off the dole and the political risks are far too great.
Labor has already taken steps to make it harder to get disability benefits. They could still make it harder but I would suspect some resistance to that and even thinking about touching those payments would be suicide.
They could raise the pension age but that would also be suicide and cutting pensions would lead to outrage among pensioners which are becoming a larger and larger voting bloc.
You could make cuts in other areas but those would probably only address the loss in revenue from repealing the carbon and the mining taxes and any massive cuts would likely be viewed poorly in the electorate and would stop economic growth.
Hockey might talk tough but I doubt that he would have the backbone to make it a reality.
I think we're at the point where anyone who is on the dole for 5 years must be just about genuinely unemployable.
How hard is it to pack fruit, stack shelves or sleep at your desk in the PS?
I know what he is saying but at the least we now have a good idea of what this country could be like in the perfect world of the minds from those the right.
But at least Hockey had the nerve to speak his mind.
He does know that if he tried to implement these policies in government that the government would be out on its arse at the next election.
He's Palestianian/Armenian.The age of entitlement is well and still truly alive when a Lebanese Salami spinner can become the Treasurer of Australia.
He's Palestianian/Armenian.