But if Hird inc wins tomorrow ASADA to re start it all . Trying to maximise the opprobrium- great for motivation and he'll need it if he's still there and has a VFL team.
Bomber suing Essendon?
- Thread starter SugarCoat
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Hird inc, architect
It would be unusual if Hird used that information to keep his job. It's no good out in the public arena. Once out, it has no currency.
It's hornets nests playing for sheep stations.
ok. I remembered something about Thompson (or Hird?) telling Dank to get rid of PEDS stuff out of his fridge as well.
It seems there were an awful lot of PEDS being stored on the premises
Little may well have calculated that bans are coming and gave up the fight for Bomber... But he obviously hung bomber out the side
Also turned over a lot of lawyers., media and PR employees, companies and consultants.
Little's such a bad decision maker. If he can't get rid of him for running a reckless program that has put the safety of the players at risk, what more weight does the fact that there's enough evidence to be satisfied PED's were used matter. It's poor.
who is if not him
The Essendonians and some other group of Essendon supporting legal types( the LawDons or something) are apparently funding The Exalted One's squirmings.
Apex Predators
Team Captain
- Dec 31, 2014
- 534
- 742
- AFL Club
- West Coast
But wasn't it Hird et al in 2013 lamenting that they wished that they could tell their side of the story, that we would all see what good guys they are, but they can't comment on an ongoing investigation.
Now they have told ASADA stuff, don't like ASADA'sinterpretation so want to have it ruled all unlawful so the tribunal can't hear it either.
Im sure Hird fans will accept the verdict no matter how it falls as they realise the game is greater than the individual..................................
Muggs
Premiership Player
A Hird win does not automatically mean ASADA needs to start it all.
Laphroaig had it
Are you suggesting that News Ltd. are funding Hird's legal bills......or are you just referring to the instance where News was briefed (on the clock) by Hird's lawyer once?
Hird asks the club's dietitian and recovery expert, Benita Lalor, to read the study. The following day, Lalor reports back, saying there is no proof of beneficial effects, no data on possible side-effects of long-term use and, potentially, a risk of unintended muscle damage.
Hird immediately forwards Lalor's email to his long-term mentor Danny Corcoran, adding a frustrated rejoinder. "This is what we are dealing with."
Paul Little behind it?
yaco55
Hall of Famer
It was supposedly organised by the group that wanted an EGM to save Hird's job. Though this wasn't needed at the end of the day.
yaco55
Hall of Famer
It was the kayaker !
yaco55
Hall of Famer
You'll find that a number on the Essendon Board at that time wanted Hird sacked. The feeling was that he was on a different page to the club and needed to be cut loose.
Look outside the club for the leak.
yaco55
Hall of Famer
yaco55
Hall of Famer
Andrew B has good info. I would trust his info about Hird's legal bills.
Poor Andrew B - Villified on the HTB, goes onto BB and is villified even more.
He must be a glutton for punishment.
Poor Andrew B - Villified on the HTB, goes onto BB and is villified even more.
He must be a glutton for punishment.
I hope for Essendon's sake that he loses but I hope for justice's sake that he wins.
No administrative body in Australia should be able to compel testimony. The right to silence is sacrosanct.
Unless you are facing a royal commission....
- Status
