LanceRomance
Brownlow Medallist
Lonergan.
If it is him, I guess the "disgruntled former employee" line will rolled out
and if it is him, everyone will standbyslamminsam
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Lonergan.
If it is him, I guess the "disgruntled former employee" line will rolled out
Was pretty much their last card to play it would seemCan now see why the player's lawyers cross examined the medical expert as to the illegal status of TB4. Because it was incredibly relevant to the Tribunal's proceedings.
and why they spent so long debating what was admissable and what wasntCan now see why the player's lawyers cross examined the medical expert as to the illegal status of TB4. Because it was incredibly relevant to the Tribunal's proceedings.
True.and why they spent so long debating what was admissable and what wasnt
and why they spent so long debating what was admissable and what wasnt
page 121Have I missed something? Has something come out recently??
Go blues post 121Have I missed something? Has something come out recently??
Have I missed something? Has something come out recently??
Need to give the info to Bruce first then. Doesn't seem to be able to make an opinion or interpretation by himselfI'm looking forward to gigity's interpretation.
Need to give the info to Bruce first then. Doesn't seem to be able to make an opinion or interpretation by himself
Need to give the info to Bruce first then. Doesn't seem to be able to make an opinion or interpretation by himself
I'm looking forward to gigity's interpretation.
Something about shiny arsed steroids and Mickey Mouse public servants.
Go blues has burst the htb wide open.
Yea l read that post, was very convincing.Along with the same information from another source posted on the EFC Board, the deleted (but still available?) "evidence" post the other night, the post a week or so back on the EFC Board from someone who knows one of the players and said that ASADA could place TB4 at Essendon and the players should be prepared for bans.
But ... what would be really concerning is that it's all one-way traffic. Where are the leaks of information that confirm that the players were NOT given TB4?
Along with the same information from another source posted on the EFC Board, the deleted (but still available?) "evidence" post the other night, the post a week or so back on the EFC Board from someone who knows one of the players and said that ASADA could place TB4 at Essendon and the players should be prepared for bans.
But ... what would be really concerning is that it's all one-way traffic. Where are the leaks of information that confirm that the players were NOT given TB4?
I wonder how the AFL will spin this to minimise damage
not sure honesty is the AFL way. (yes I know thats funny coming from an Essendon supporter)The best way to minimise the damage would be for the AFL and EFC to not spin anything at all, but to be upfront and honest.
Which was always the case.