- Oct 20, 2014
- 18,274
- 19,359
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Yousomebody is out to lunch, dinner and breakfast. not in for a single meal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yousomebody is out to lunch, dinner and breakfast. not in for a single meal.
Oh, and you do? Quite a stretch to say that nobody uses the term, when I have heard it used by demolishers before.nope. nobody uses that term to refer to demolishing a building. you just read that on some stupid truther site. you know **** all about demolition.
It's the convenient timing of it. He leases the building six weeks before the 9/11 attacks, then gets a hefty $4.55 billion from it. He also tried to sue the airlines who crashed into the towers for over $8 billion. The twin towers were basically a white elephant due to the asbestos. And coincidentally missed work that morning, as well as a couple of family members too. Wow, he must be exceptionally lucky hey? So forgive me that I think it's all a little too coincidental, and he's a money hungry POS.yeah. fancy having terrorism insurance when you own something that has been previously targeted by terrorists and then there's that inconvenient fact that the insurance payout didn't cover silverstein's outlays, lol.
Yet Jowenko stated that building 7 was demolished.i know exactly who jowenko was and what he said. i included that quote so you could see one of your experts pointing out your fantasies. pull it has never been used to refer to demolition. except by idiots. like you
His department has been lying about various things for years. The only reason I am quoting him is because this information was already out in the open and independently verified. You can believe what you want about selective quoting, quite frankly I don't give a rat's scrotum.no, you quote him because it suits you, while ignoring evidence from his department, because it doesn't suit you. government evidence can't be trusted, except when you want it to be otherwise.
Do you have an independent source for that?i've already pointed out and sourced the fact that it wasn't money that was missing, but transaction records. and while it was unaccounted for at the time (several months before 911) , it eventually was accounted for. you know, despite the cunning plan to fire a "missile" into the pentagon to stop the investigation. that had been going on for months. and was already in senate hearings. and had very little to do with the current administration.
And? What does that prove, exactly?check out the date of the article, cretin.
Yeah, see, I'm a very sceptical person about the whole 9/11 thing but this is a load of bull.Do you seriously believe metabunk is a legitimate source? They are still claiming that it was Osama bin Laden ffs lol.
Watch September Clues, see how obvious it is that the footage we were shown was fake. It is all there.
EDIT: Who is talking about holograms? Nobody of any repute.
The facts of 9/11 are simple: The footage we were shown was blatantly fabricated, a plane can not disappear into a building.
The obvious hypothesis is also simple: nobody died, nobody got hurt.
What does the word 'sceptical' mean to you?Yeah, see, I'm a very sceptical person about the whole 9/11 thing but this is a load of bull.
To me it means expressing doubt about things that are taken for granted just because an authority (or influence) says so.What does the word 'sceptical' mean to you?
Are you talking about me or SB? I have no real opinion on that. You and the rest of the world knows that no plane hit The Pentagon!yeah, definitely NOT the guy that says no planes were involved on 911!
He'll just lump you in with SB anyway, just because you don't believe the official narrative.Are you talking about me or SB? I have no real opinion on that. You and the rest of the world knows that no plane hit The Pentagon!
To me it means questioning claims. As in, looking at the evidence before dismissing them. Have you taken the time to study September Clues and Cluesforum.info?To me it means expressing doubt about things that are taken for granted just because an authority (or influence) says so.
That claim most certainly is in question. Pilots for 911 Truth and Cluesforum both dispute the plane theory.However, some things really aren't in question. Like planes crashing into the towers.
Who are these 'thousands of poeple'? Where can I find their testimonies?It was witnessed live by thousands of people on the spot, some of whom I know personally.
Blatantly and obviously so. How far do you think humans can jump from a window?Were the people who fell from the towers as they were burning faked too?
New York is a very big city. It was the start of a working day, there would have been thousands of people going through their daily routine. Many eyes would have been up the moment they say one of the towers smoking.Who are these 'thousands of poeple'? Where can I find their testimonies?
Laterally? It depends on their size, momentum and how much space there was for them to jump through.Blatantly and obviously so. How far do you think humans can jump from a window?
Is there footage of this? How far was he from the window? Are all the windows really 7ft tall? Are those measurements even accurate?
Oh, and you do?
Quite a stretch to say that nobody uses the term, when I have heard it used by demolishers before.
To pull a building is to bring it down. It is interchangeable with pull down.
Heck, I'll even go to a demolition company's office personally and ask them that question.
It's the convenient timing of it. He leases the building six weeks before the 9/11 attacks
then gets a hefty $4.55 billion from it.
He also tried to sue the airlines who crashed into the towers for over $8 billion.
The twin towers were basically a white elephant due to the asbestos. And coincidentally missed work that morning, as well as a couple of family members too. Wow, he must be exceptionally lucky hey? So forgive me that I think it's all a little too coincidental, and he's a money hungry POS.
Yet Jowenko stated that building 7 was demolished.
That makes your point moot, essentially.
Throwing out the insults already? Try to stick to the subject at hand instead of being a jerk.
Do you have an independent source for that?
And? What does that prove, exactly?
The only reason I don't believe in the official story is because there was a lot of coincidences that makes the whole thing look shady.
Hurling insults at me isn't going to change my mind or make your points more logical or rational.
calling me a cretin and idiot...
I didn't bring up the 'thousands of witnesses' claim, you did. So I infer that you must have a reference for that claim. Where can I look to find these testimonies to examine them for myself? Or are you just repeating the '3000' figure direct from the msm?New York is a very big city. It was the start of a working day, there would have been thousands of people going through their daily routine. Many eyes would have been up the moment they say one of the towers smoking.
Why is it necessary to have testimony from every single individual? There's enough of it.
Good questions which have all been answered in great detail at cluesforum.infoIs there footage of this? How far was he from the window? Are all the windows really 7ft tall? Are those measurements even accurate?
Then this is a pointless discussion. Instead of reasoning with people and being civil, you play the man. Going in circles.i don't care and i'm not here to change your mind. you can't reason someone out of an opinion they didn't reason themselves into. i'm only here because your stupid bullshit and conceited arrogance pisses me off.
is all you deserve.
Are you talking about me or SB?
You and the rest of the world knows that no plane hit The Pentagon!
It isn't hard to fly a plane past and fire a cruise missile at the building.in both posts i was referencing SB.
the idea that you can blow a hole in a building (next to a major highway just after peak hour no less) and then claim a hijacked plane caused the damage is just so ******* stupid i mean the sheer logistics of even trying to do something like that boggles the mind lol.
who vets these impossibly vast, super cunning ideas? they should fire that guy. maybe then he'll tell us what really happened to the plane and all its passengers!
Instead of reasoning with people and being civil, you play the man.
Hah, you call out arrogance when you make unfounded assumptions of where I get my information from or what I believe.
It isn't hard to fly a plane past and fire a cruise missile at the building.
What Flight 77?even if i accept that premise for the sake of argument, that doesn't even begin to cover the logistics.
the most obvious issue being what happened to flight 77 and its passengers/crew (and how the remains of both ended up in the pentagon).
the flight 77 stuff was easily the most idiotic (mainstream) opinion embraced by truthers.
The point is, it doesn't do anything except make you look like an rude arse. It doesn't convey any point, it doesn't try to rationalise and educate. Other people who are on the other side of the fence don't seem to be insulting you, you're the only one who's doing it. I could have called you a "shill" and a "closed minded moron" from the get-go, but I didn't. Because I don't believe you are such things, and even if I did, I wouldn't say it in your face in a discussion like this.i don't understand why you feel you deserve better, to be honest. if you're still wrong and full of s**t after all these years, what do you expect?
Well, just because I might think one even is a conspiracy doesn't necessarily mean I follow stupid s**t like NASA faking the moon landings and such.this isn't my first rodeo and you guys are extremely predictable. there is also the published research that suggests the biggest indicator of whether someone believes in any specific conspiracy theory, is belief in other conspiracy theories.
troll
Troll
Troll
...biggest indicator of whether someone believes in any specific conspiracy theory, is belief in other conspiracy theories.
What Flight 77?
um how did you get that? do you have a source or not?sorry, are you saying the planes didn't exist/didn't hit the towers?
The point is, it doesn't do anything except make you look like an rude arse.
um how did you get that? do you have a source or not?