For the last time, thy brings the sass. FMD.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whereas KoR takes pride in bringing the ass...For the last time, thy brings the sass. FMD.
Who cares about 200 games.
Does it do anything? Automatic life membership or something?
100 makes sense. Its the cut off for father sons. But 180 odd vs 200 doesnt seem like much of a difference to me
Let Carrots stay home and make amother set of triplets and let Whiley play
I must say that I was a little "upset" that we didn't give Fisher 1 more game to get him to 100
That said there is a BIG difference to 1 more extra game and 18 extra games. Give Carazzo a game if he deserves it, but don't weaken the team to get him to a milestone.
I'd completely forgotten about Fisher. I had to google it.
For the last time, thy brings the sass. FMD.
Sarss more like it
Hard to forget the 99s.
I grew up with a guy who became a state cricketer. Paul Reiffel (Vic captain) declared the Vic innings with my mate on 99 not out. Would have been his first first-class century. Took him a while after that to make a 100 in a shield match.
Carrazzo has played 182 games. 18 home and away games left in the season. If he continues to get games it is because we want to get him to 200.
Hard to forget the 99s.
I grew up with a guy who became a state cricketer. Paul Reiffel (Vic captain) declared the Vic innings with my mate on 99 not out. Would have been his first first-class century. Took him a while after that to make a 100 in a shield match.
That's pretty silly if we carry someone just because he/we wants 200 as a milestone. We should be playing someone on performance not on field seniority. Mentorship programs can be executed without playing.
Perfect example was Fisher.....
You've changed your tune Harks !
We might have to even let MEB go.
Carrazzo has played 182 games. 18 home and away games left in the season. If he continues to get games it is because we want to get him to 200.
Nobody's going anywhere !!
Bit of a prick move. Was it overnight (could understand that) or during an innings break ??? Outside of that I say go 1 more over to let the guy have his milestone !!!!!!!
Considering he would have to be gifted the remainder of the season (assuming we don't have an extra 3 games or so ), it leaves no wriggle room to be dropped for form, injury, or to let a kid in that's going good.Completely agree. If ever there was a case for gifting a game, it would be from 99 to 100. The father son angle is pretty insignificant. Very few sons turn out to be top flight quality.
I guess in the club's defense, we were approaching finals, Brad was on his way back from a knee injury and his last game was very ordinary IIRC.
I can't see Carrazzo getting gifted games for milestones. He'll play if he's better than the alternative. Although, you could make a case that if we are in rebuild mode, you could take a step backwards in playing younger guys if they are thereabouts, in order to build them up for next year and beyond.
Mark Robinsonescribe Carlton’s predicament on the field.
Mark LoGiudice: This would be a result of five to 10 years of poor administration and recruiting.
MR: Describe the actual predicament on-field?
ML: We don’t have enough depth on our list, full stop. We have great talent on our list, but I don’t think it runs deep enough.
That's our own president giving our list a whack.
With due respect to the president, what on earth would he know about list depth and football talent that any one of us here wouldn't know? He is just parroting the accepted line. He really shouldn't be commenting on football matters. He's not qualified to do so.
I'm just saying ... mathematics.
The team still wants to win, Mick still wants to win. We've given games to inexperienced players like Jaksch, Smith, Boekhorst, Dick, Cripps, Buckley, Menzel, Byrne, Docherty. We still need those guys to develop with leaders around them.
While I would like to see Whiley and Graham come in, I'd be leaning towards replacing Curnow and Ellard but I agree that Carrazzo is on the precipice and won't offer as much going forward. I do think it is important for our culture that we honour our good servants to an extent as long as he can hold his own. Judd had made it known he was retiring last year but there is no way he would have been dropped to develop another youngster.
Everything in moderation.
You always put everything into perspective....agree to disagree I suppose.