TradeDraft
Premium Platinum
Nice Article on Witts:
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/baby-s...ts-proved-doubters-wrong-20150702-gi3ci9.html
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/baby-s...ts-proved-doubters-wrong-20150702-gi3ci9.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nice Article on Witts
How can a giant take baby steps?
First the left foot, then the right.How can a giant take baby steps?
I agree.Jeez that was a tough read.
Article needs a good editor to tighten up flow and expression at points. Witts and Grundy certainly aren't your classic (dumb) ruckmen are they?
The mention of him playing the trumpet got me briefly and weirdly excited. Think i just liked the idea of a 7 foot tall ruckman busting out some smooth jazz in his down time. Disappointing he gave it away.
.
There's no way we should trade him, we need both of them.Cheers, I like Witts and if I didn't love the Caff a little bit more would have him on my sig. But then might not given his name comes up when talking trades.
Not the cardigans. Surely that's not acceptable. What sort of club is this!I thought the article was Ok. Wittsy: quiet, reserved, different, even likes cardigans. I can cope with that. A touch of Alan Partridge?
I am not so sure you can/should carry two quality first rucks who aren't viable KP forwards on a list. If we could get a really good trade for Whitts from GWS for instance we should seriously consider it. Where we would have been last week is a function of exiting the likes of Ceglar or even Wood. Whits could have real currency though and the reality is only good players have good currency. It just happens that we have two promising up and coming ruckmen. I'd definitely consider a trade - for the right price and then bring in a FA option.There's no way we should trade him, we need both of them.
The peanuts who wantt to trade him just need to imagine where we'd be last week if we didn't have him and Grundy out injured.
Great article too, makes me think he's a keeper even more.
I am not so sure you can/should carry two quality first rucks who aren't viable KP forwards on a list. If we could get a really good trade for Whitts from GWS for instance we should seriously consider it. Where we would have been last week is a function of exiting the likes of Ceglar or even Wood. Whits could have real currency though and the reality is only good players have good currency. It just happens that we have two promising up and coming ruckmen. I'd definitely consider a trade - for the right price and then bring in a FA option.