Northern Exposure Marketing

Remove this Banner Ad

Sausages

HIGH PRIEST IN THE TEMPLE OF GG/SNSD
Feb 27, 2007
6,397
9,189
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
Other Teams
Luton Town
Hello, welcome to NEM.

Here at NEM, we believe that there is a distinct lack of key marketing angles being pursued by the AFL.

Herein, find enclosed our proposal.

The three platforms we'll focus on will be :

1. representation of the game to QLD and NSW
2. recognition of each state's stars, best players both past and present
3. exposure of under 20's to a wider audience

It's an accepted and moderate position to say that AFL is entrenched in QLD and NSW as the second or third placed winter football code. Challenged as all codes are by soccer at junior levels. The goal here would be to pursue a course allowing it an opportunity to displace other competitors as the primary winter football sport. It is our view that pursuing these focal points will advance this goal.

Given this, it's our position that the first 2 points of our plan can be combined. Appealing to parochialism is appropriate and frankly necessary to align identity with the sport. The concept that the game is played everywhere and popularly is ideally served by recognising this fact in isolation. Given the disparate nature of Australian states, a seven team SoO competition isn't viable. Without national side representation, again there is no focus on where the payers are from - how many great debates are there over the Australian cricket Test team selection referencing statehood? These concepts are meaningful and real and are critical in allowing the 2 northern states to embrace the history of the game at state level as a part of the state's history, rather than something invented in those markets by television.

Furthermore, all states deserve such recognition and thus it should be a seven person focus.

The other angle is to ensure developing athletes see the sport as a viable, long-term and professional pursuit. More exposure to the demands and realities of a professional footballer for developing players at under 20 level who are already on AFL lists and increased exposure to those in similar age brackets at state level who may be considering nomination at a draft, or indeed did do so in the previous year's draft and have continued to play their trade at state level.

The last consideration is to link these ideas as a package.

Each year, following the AFL Grand Final, our 7 person state team will select 5 players aged under 18/19/20 (exact cut-off to be determined) to form a 35 man team from within those players already on AFL club lists.
Where possible, they should prioritise players from their own state first to select this 5.
This team will play an exhibition game against like age players selected by the AFL from the State Leagues, ideally happening prior to the live draft.
Consideration could be made to allow stand-out performers from this game to nominate for the draft despite not being otherwise eligible. For the AFL players, it is another chance to put forward their credentials as future club captains, marketable identities to potential sponsors etc. Media focus should be at saturation levels.

The 7 man team will also adjudge the participants of both sides for otherwise un-quantifiables...how are the players approaching the game? Professionally? Do they care enough to perform at their very best? Think mobile media platforms to distribute these contacts, allowing the watcher to feel "inside" the process. Furthermore, from a club angle, having a senior player be in contact with a few of your young players in this arena could only be beneficial.

We invite the community to respond.
 
In response to your 3 platforms

1. AFL needs to put more pressure on Channel 7 to broadcast on their main channel not 7Mate. This will increase exposure more than anything else will.

2. Just not going to happen. There is an AFL hall of fame and that is where recognition of past players will stop. As for current players, without the reintroduction of State of Origin it can't happen in any meaningful manner.

The AFL commission really has no idea of the actual level of interest that would be there for a State of Origin match, the fans actually do want it. I can see two games in particular garnering big interest, Vic v SA and NSW/ACT v Qld/NT. Maybe scrap the international rules series which no-one cares about and try this. WA could play Tasmania.

3. Can't happen. Firstly not a fan of the under 18 comp, under 19s was a much better concept. Under 20 is also just a ludicrous as players by then are already well established into the system.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Hello, welcome to NEM.

Here at NEM, we believe that there is a distinct lack of key marketing angles being pursued by the AFL.

Herein, find enclosed our proposal.

The three platforms we'll focus on will be :

1. representation of the game to QLD and NSW
2. recognition of each state's stars, best players both past and present
3. exposure of under 20's to a wider audience

It's an accepted and moderate position to say that AFL is entrenched in QLD and NSW as the second or third placed winter football code. Challenged as all codes are by soccer at junior levels. The goal here would be to pursue a course allowing it an opportunity to displace other competitors as the primary winter football sport. It is our view that pursuing these focal points will advance this goal.

Given this, it's our position that the first 2 points of our plan can be combined. Appealing to parochialism is appropriate and frankly necessary to align identity with the sport. The concept that the game is played everywhere and popularly is ideally served by recognising this fact in isolation. Given the disparate nature of Australian states, a seven team SoO competition isn't viable. Without national side representation, again there is no focus on where the payers are from - how many great debates are there over the Australian cricket Test team selection referencing statehood? These concepts are meaningful and real and are critical in allowing the 2 northern states to embrace the history of the game at state level as a part of the state's history, rather than something invented in those markets by television.

Furthermore, all states deserve such recognition and thus it should be a seven person focus.

The other angle is to ensure developing athletes see the sport as a viable, long-term and professional pursuit. More exposure to the demands and realities of a professional footballer for developing players at under 20 level who are already on AFL lists and increased exposure to those in similar age brackets at state level who may be considering nomination at a draft, or indeed did do so in the previous year's draft and have continued to play their trade at state level.

The last consideration is to link these ideas as a package.

Each year, following the AFL Grand Final, our 7 person state team will select 5 players aged under 18/19/20 (exact cut-off to be determined) to form a 35 man team from within those players already on AFL club lists.
Where possible, they should prioritise players from their own state first to select this 5.
This team will play an exhibition game against like age players selected by the AFL from the State Leagues, ideally happening prior to the live draft.
Consideration could be made to allow stand-out performers from this game to nominate for the draft despite not being otherwise eligible. For the AFL players, it is another chance to put forward their credentials as future club captains, marketable identities to potential sponsors etc. Media focus should be at saturation levels.

The 7 man team will also adjudge the participants of both sides for otherwise un-quantifiables...how are the players approaching the game? Professionally? Do they care enough to perform at their very best? Think mobile media platforms to distribute these contacts, allowing the watcher to feel "inside" the process. Furthermore, from a club angle, having a senior player be in contact with a few of your young players in this arena could only be beneficial.

We invite the community to respond.

You need to campaign for AFL Divisions to be introduced.

AFL West (4 Teams, with prospects for a 5th)
Adelaide Crows
Fremantle Dockers
Port Adelaide Power
West Coast Eagles

AFL North (4 Teams, with prospects for a 5th)
Brisbane Lions
Gold Coast Suns
Greater Western Sydney Giants
Sydney Swans

AFL South (5 Teams) & AFL Central (5 Teams)
An Odds/ Evens split each year of 10 Victorian teams.
Carlton Blues
Collingwood Magpies
Essendon Bombers
Geelong Cats
Hawthorn Hawks
Melbourne Demons
North Melbourne Kangaroos
Richmond Tigers
St. Kilda Saints
Western Bulldogs

Each year put two divisions "together" in a Conference. (A small and a large division)

For example AFL West & AFL Central (9 teams) and on the other side AFL North & AFL South (9 teams).

Play all other teams in your conference twice (8 x 2=16) and play the 9 teams in the other conference once (9). 16+9=25 games.

Each Division can then play for a Divisional Championship each year. In fact, the AFL North Division can count back Divisional Champions since 1987 - when there were 2 teams in AFL North.

As AFL North has not yet been formalised, the previous 28 years can simply be awarded to the highest finishing team that now plays in AFL North. As you can see, the Sydney Swans have been winning this contest since 2007.

"Matthews/Roos" Cup (Awarded to Highest placed team in the Northern States)
1987 Sydney Swans (1) OVERALL CHAMPIONSHIPS
1988 Sydney Swans (2) Sydney Swans - 17
1989 Sydney Swans (3) Brisbane Lions - 11
1990 Sydney Swans (4)
1991 Sydney Swans (5)
1992 Brisbane Bears (1)
1993 Brisbane Bears (2)
1994 Brisbane Bears (3)
1995 Brisbane Bears (4)
1996 Sydney Swans (6)
1997 Sydney Swans (7)
1998 Sydney Swans (8)
1999 Brisbane Lions (5)
2000 Brisbane Lions (6)
2001 Brisbane Lions (7)
2002 Brisbane Lions (8)
2003 Brisbane Lions (9)
2004 Brisbane Lions (10)
2005 Sydney Swans (9)
2006 Sydney Swans (10)
2007 Sydney Swans (11)
2008 Sydney Swans (12)
2009 Brisbane Lions (11)
2010 Sydney Swans (13)
2011 Sydney Swans (14)
2012 Sydney Swans (15)
2013 Sydney Swans (16)
2014 Sydney Swans (17)
 
Alternative ideas:
- Club academies
- The NEAFL
- Under 18's state champs
- The National draft, held each year on the Gold Coast
- Trade week
- 2 teams in each state playing each other twice a year
- Get Gold Coast and Brisbane to get their s**t together! (I think both clubs are on the right track after a terrible start this year)

I can't quite work out what Sausages is campaigning for exactly but some kind of under 20's state league exhibition game doesn't sound like a popular idea to me. I'm trying to imagine watching VIC v WA in a similar version and I just can't get it.

One thing I think they could do is bring back 'The Recruit' and include NEAFL players. Don't give the winner any draft advantage just give them money and let them enter the draft, but if you pick well enough the winner will be drafted. With more academy graduates presumably going on to play in the NEAFL the talent base should be building. Obviously the show would've been most popular in the mainstream footy states but it would be a way to get exposure to NSW and QLD.
 
Hello, welcome to NEM.

Here at NEM, we believe that there is a distinct lack of key marketing angles being pursued by the AFL.

Herein, find enclosed our proposal.

The three platforms we'll focus on will be :

1. representation of the game to QLD and NSW
2. recognition of each state's stars, best players both past and present
3. exposure of under 20's to a wider audience

It's an accepted and moderate position to say that AFL is entrenched in QLD and NSW as the second or third placed winter football code. Challenged as all codes are by soccer at junior levels. The goal here would be to pursue a course allowing it an opportunity to displace other competitors as the primary winter football sport. It is our view that pursuing these focal points will advance this goal.

Given this, it's our position that the first 2 points of our plan can be combined. Appealing to parochialism is appropriate and frankly necessary to align identity with the sport. The concept that the game is played everywhere and popularly is ideally served by recognising this fact in isolation. Given the disparate nature of Australian states, a seven team SoO competition isn't viable. Without national side representation, again there is no focus on where the payers are from - how many great debates are there over the Australian cricket Test team selection referencing statehood? These concepts are meaningful and real and are critical in allowing the 2 northern states to embrace the history of the game at state level as a part of the state's history, rather than something invented in those markets by television.

Furthermore, all states deserve such recognition and thus it should be a seven person focus.

The other angle is to ensure developing athletes see the sport as a viable, long-term and professional pursuit. More exposure to the demands and realities of a professional footballer for developing players at under 20 level who are already on AFL lists and increased exposure to those in similar age brackets at state level who may be considering nomination at a draft, or indeed did do so in the previous year's draft and have continued to play their trade at state level.

The last consideration is to link these ideas as a package.

Each year, following the AFL Grand Final, our 7 person state team will select 5 players aged under 18/19/20 (exact cut-off to be determined) to form a 35 man team from within those players already on AFL club lists.
Where possible, they should prioritise players from their own state first to select this 5.
This team will play an exhibition game against like age players selected by the AFL from the State Leagues, ideally happening prior to the live draft.
Consideration could be made to allow stand-out performers from this game to nominate for the draft despite not being otherwise eligible. For the AFL players, it is another chance to put forward their credentials as future club captains, marketable identities to potential sponsors etc. Media focus should be at saturation levels.

The 7 man team will also adjudge the participants of both sides for otherwise un-quantifiables...how are the players approaching the game? Professionally? Do they care enough to perform at their very best? Think mobile media platforms to distribute these contacts, allowing the watcher to feel "inside" the process. Furthermore, from a club angle, having a senior player be in contact with a few of your young players in this arena could only be beneficial.

We invite the community to respond.

Sorry, i couldn't read this.

I wish the Lions would win some games, just for you :), that will solve plenty.
 
rather then gimmicky crap develop a proper school boy league and promote it. Then try to get seven to promote the game they are paying exclusive rights for.

a million ******* horse racing ads same with soccer friendlies but almost no mention of footy unless your watching a footy game on 73, it seems counter productive when promoting the game.

You look at how 9 ramps up coverage in the lead up to rugby league compared to channel 7? The biggest coverage comes from the today show when the sports guy drops not so subtle barbs at kochie.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top