Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Richmond never bombed it into the forward line hoping for a contested mark or crumb either like we do. That's where our inside 50 is really inefficient. Their ball use last night was pretty sublime. Rarely any fumbles or turnovers.
Yeah they did but it was a last resort and it was well set up. They always had a tall around the 50 just in case and when the long kick was taken the rest of the Tigers knew exactly where it was headed so were able to get there to crumb or as was mostly the case, tie it up for another stoppage and avoid it getting straight back out like it does with us.
That was a great piece of play.They also kicked to advantage. That mark in the second to maric was a case in point. Slightly to his right so he could work the defender away from the ball
I would say simmo knows them just as well, will be interesting next weekThat it wasn't unexpected that Richmond would win. Hardwick knows how to beat them. He worked with Clarkson at both Port and Hawthorn, he knows the Hawthorn style better than any other coach.
Sorry, but his open love of Wayne Carey in the 90s even made a gay couple I'm friends with giggle. He has always been a tosser.He was decent in the 90s but my god Bruce's inane and orgasmic commentary is crap these days.
Yeah you are right he's always been overrated, just was nowhere near as bad back then.Sorry, but his open love of Wayne Carey in the 90s even made a gay couple I'm friends with giggle. He has always been a tosser.
Very true. In some ways I've learned to tolerate Bruce with time cos despite going on too much about his favorites and lapsing into overexcitement, he at least knows his limits, unlike, say Zempilas.Sorry, but his open love of Wayne Carey in the 90s even made a gay couple I'm friends with giggle. He has always been a tosser.
Hehehe, maybe I'm more tolerant now. But the king is just sooooo special! Special!! Special!!!.Yeah you are right he's always been overrated, just was nowhere near as bad back then.
Poppy! Poppy!! POPPY!!!
Yeah they did but it was a last resort and it was well set up. They always had a tall around the 50 just in case and when the long kick was taken the rest of the Tigers knew exactly where it was headed so were able to get there to crumb or as was mostly the case, tie it up for another stoppage and avoid it getting straight back out like it does with us.
Yep, I think this is the heart of it - at some point you have to be prepared to take on the game and beat a man (or three). It is fine to move it slowly out of defense, but it needs to be lateral or forward, not backwards unless there is a definite outlet on the other side and you can get it moving quickly.Yeah they moved it slowly and carefully out of defence, but it seemed on a couple of occasions when both teams were pressed up pretty hard they chose to go the run and long kick.
Especially when Deledio is one out in the forward 50. That's almost as good as having Fyfe one on one.
Yep, I think this is the heart of it - at some point you have to be prepared to take on the game and beat a man (or three). It is fine to move it slowly out of defense, but it needs to be lateral or forward, not backwards unless there is a definite outlet on the other side and you can get it moving quickly.
We need to see more guys prepared to take it on, risk making a mistake and get the ball forward quickly.
We need to see more guys prepared to take it on, risk making a mistake and get the ball forward quickly.
Yeah, I guess it's knowing when to hold and when to fold...I think we're much more open to taking risks and moving the ball quickly, we just have guys who's disposal isn't quite up to the task.
Last night Richmond did go when they had the chance on the outside, but when the Hawks were set up, they held on to the ball with extreme patience, and sometimes went long up the boundary or to a pack inside fifty if close enough.
I reckon we actually try to switch into the corridor pretty regularly. When it comes off it pays dividends, but when we fluff it it's very costly.
I think we're much more open to taking risks and moving the ball quickly, we just have guys who's disposal isn't quite up to the task.
Last night Richmond did go when they had the chance on the outside, but when the Hawks were set up, they held on to the ball with extreme patience, and sometimes went long up the boundary or to a pack inside fifty if close enough.
I reckon we actually try to switch into the corridor pretty regularly. When it comes off it pays dividends, but when we fluff it it's very costly.