- Banned
- #1
It seems to be the go to excuse for government officials, the new the dog ate my homework.
George Brandis overlooked sending a letter to the Sydney siege inquiry, as it was missed being on the second tab of a spreadsheet.
Bishop signed documents without looking at them.
The immigration department didn't seem to read any reports on contractor behavior before first attacking SHY and later defending conduct in the senate, despite a paper trail to abuse allegations and testimony staff had spied on SHY.
Greg Hunt missed an auditor generals report on the great barrier reef despite being supplied with it before going to the UN to lobby for a no change in listing.
Abetz and Tasmanian libs claiming they knew nothing about Mantachs impropriety despite being told directly. Can a dog eat a conversation?
Neither Hockey nor Abbott knew anything about their own modelling of costs of emission reduction, despite it having been confirmed both had received the report before they cited outdated modelling used in the telle and then repeated again.
How many times has Turnbull claimed ignorance re the NBN.
Now neither Dutton nor Abbot know anything about the actions of the ABF, despite the cancelled operation being part of a PR push for the ABFs launch and Dutton receiving a press release twice.
Now I know plausible deniability is part of the political game of avoiding heat, but this is outrageous.
How many times can impropriety or gross wrong doing be blamed on having not see the modeling we requested/paper I was signing/documents to be forwarded/press release and on it goes.
The amount of things that are direct ministerial responsibility, that are being placed in front of said people but somehow not being seen is truly extraordinary, either they have such low opinion of the public that the same lie being told every other week passes muster, so the dog ate my ministerial responsibility, or the level of incompetence rife in the government is reaching society threatening levels.
George Brandis overlooked sending a letter to the Sydney siege inquiry, as it was missed being on the second tab of a spreadsheet.
Bishop signed documents without looking at them.
The immigration department didn't seem to read any reports on contractor behavior before first attacking SHY and later defending conduct in the senate, despite a paper trail to abuse allegations and testimony staff had spied on SHY.
Greg Hunt missed an auditor generals report on the great barrier reef despite being supplied with it before going to the UN to lobby for a no change in listing.
Abetz and Tasmanian libs claiming they knew nothing about Mantachs impropriety despite being told directly. Can a dog eat a conversation?
Neither Hockey nor Abbott knew anything about their own modelling of costs of emission reduction, despite it having been confirmed both had received the report before they cited outdated modelling used in the telle and then repeated again.
How many times has Turnbull claimed ignorance re the NBN.
Now neither Dutton nor Abbot know anything about the actions of the ABF, despite the cancelled operation being part of a PR push for the ABFs launch and Dutton receiving a press release twice.
Now I know plausible deniability is part of the political game of avoiding heat, but this is outrageous.
How many times can impropriety or gross wrong doing be blamed on having not see the modeling we requested/paper I was signing/documents to be forwarded/press release and on it goes.
The amount of things that are direct ministerial responsibility, that are being placed in front of said people but somehow not being seen is truly extraordinary, either they have such low opinion of the public that the same lie being told every other week passes muster, so the dog ate my ministerial responsibility, or the level of incompetence rife in the government is reaching society threatening levels.