happy to stay with the factslol m8 you are about as subtle as port always.
If you're going to rag on Haysman and Duncanson just get straight to it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
happy to stay with the factslol m8 you are about as subtle as port always.
If you're going to rag on Haysman and Duncanson just get straight to it.
Mark Haysman deserves kudos for bringing the dire stadium deal into the public arena for the first time, but overall I think we think a lot more fondly of him than he probably deserves
But Fathers Day is on Sunday
His wrecking ball approach worked for some purposes (getting the ball rolling on the whole licence independence/Adelaide Oval move are as key to where we are today as anything) but in terms of the day to day running of the football club he didn't quite get it by the sounds of things. In hindsight, he was probably the right CEO for the slash and burn we needed at the time, but his usefulness expired fairly quickly and his departure wasn't a second too soon.
His wrecking ball approach worked for some purposes (getting the ball
yep, that certainly wrecked us. I don't think either of them paid an invoice either..............oh that's right it's not our fault!Yep. The fact the best he could attract sponsor wise are two companies noone had ever heard of, and noone has heard of since, who didn't even fulfill their contracts is the major black mark next to his name.
I'm certain that if you ask Kane he will tell you that in his totally unbiased opinion he is unbiased. Just like Dyson Heydon.At the end of the day, people expecting a completely unbiased, objective account of the teams dark days are going to be disappointed. .......
Finished the book last night, a great read, even though it was clearly rushed out.
I guess Kane doesn't pot Choco because they were always on each other's good side (rightly or wrongly for the big picture).
I can imagine if Brett Montgomery did a book we'd get some more cutting remarks about Choco considering he went out almost exactly the same way as Kane almost did in 2011. Do you remember how he told Monty that we weren't going to contend for 3-4 years and then Monty came out in the media after being cut and says "Hey Port fans, your coach says you won't compete for the 3 years!" Very similar situations, it all just depends what side of history you're on.
Other interesting parts: Dean Brogan was steaming after the 2007 GF, as he didn't play much in the ruck, and wanted a big review of what happened on the day. As we all know, it was simply swept under the rug as we wrote it off as a bad day.
Ricciuto and Dittmar each get a massive serve towards the end for comments in the paper/on radio regarding his retirement. Seems a bit frosty between Ditts and Kane/the club. Kane said what everyone else has about Roo, that how a Crows board member shouldn't be commenting on us, because the reverse wouldn't be tolerated. Funny of course that he gives the old man a pass for dodgy comments made in the media.
Obviously Primus absolutely cops it, clearly in over his head. Ken gets a massive wrap, and the behind the scenes stuff only adds to it. Gave Kane a colossal spray after the 2013 Port/St Kilda/Crows pre-season triple header.
Reading it only reinforces a theory of mine that the 2004 Premiership team marked the end of an era in terms of list management, professionalism, culture etc. We very much got caught out behind the times having gone all in for a premiership, whereas every team since has taken a more long-term approach and used the draft and development to replenish and extend their window.
I would strongly recommend giving it a read.
So what you're saying is 10/10, would read again?
Professional football club and reigning AFL premier booted off school ovals so Under 13's can train.... you couldn't make this s**t up, what the **** were ppl thinkingComplacency that set in after 2004 is pretty disturbing. Half-arsing the pre-season by training once a week at a school oval so we can do an extended victory lap is an idea that nobody would want to own up to now.
As was the mess he inherited....
Re those two absolute dud sponsors from the Haysman days that no one had ever heard of before, or since, what a joke that was.
...
Which Big W did you get it from?? The Brickworks Big W didnt have it?Picked it up from Big W this morning for $22.
Which Big W did you get it from?? The Brickworks Big W didnt have it?
Yep. The fact the best he could attract sponsor wise are two companies noone had ever heard of, and noone has heard of since, who didn't even fulfill their contracts is the major black mark next to his name.
Just read the first chapter. It's about 2012. Gws, Primus, McCarthy. Intriguing.
Says he will never forget Primus' first words after that loss.
"I'm f***ed, I'm done"
Best part of the interview last night for me was how it showed that Chad has matured about himself in acknowledging his past shortcomings and in doing so is obviously trying to educate and improve those around him. I would love to have Chad back at the club one day in an official capacity.