- Dec 22, 2009
- 62,677
- 36,714
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
Lol Guardian.
What deal?
So 22m plus Navas?
I've read 18m + Navas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol Guardian.
What deal?
So 22m plus Navas?
They are saying £22m to United for De Gea. £7m to Madrid for Navas.Lol Guardian.
What deal?
So 22m plus Navas?
United said until either we get a satisfactory bid or until De Gea actually asks to leave he stays. We acted like any other club would with a star playerI think people are getting hung up a bit on fault or no fault.
What has happened has happened. Could it have been handled better by United. IMO yes.
But for me I thought the best thing for United was to sell, and the deal falling through (if it does) is a bad thing for them.
Others don't see it that way but there really is no tin foil hat conspiracy to make United look bad.
They are the only ones breaking it down like that.They are saying £22m to United for De Gea. £7m to Madrid for Navas.
£29m deal.
Either way, I've heard that the deal might still go through but neither player will be registered until January.
They are saying £22m to United for De Gea. £7m to Madrid for Navas.
£29m deal.
Either way, I've heard that the deal might still go through but neither player will be registered until January.
Ends justifies the means in the long run.Yay so we started high and got the best we could. When other clubs bid below what other clubs demand it's good negotiating, when United demand a high fee it's terrible negotiating and incompetence. Never change BF.
Not sure. It's the only article I've read.They are the only ones breaking it down like that.
And you choose the Guardian?Not sure. It's the only article I've read.
I don't think so. Both clubs have had plenty of time to make a deal, and both were fully aware of when it had to be done by.LFP should be able to make a call on the whole situation and allow it to happen if both RM / United are on board. Makes sense.
Did a search on twitter. First article that came up was that.And you choose the Guardian?
Oh. And you still chose to read it?Did a search on twitter. First article that came up was that.
Yeah, why not? Guardian is ok.Oh. And you still chose to read it?
They are saying £22m to United for De Gea. £7m to Madrid for Navas.
£29m deal.
Either way, I've heard that the deal might still go through but neither player will be registered until January.
Good thing that wasn't the deal.If it's 22m for De Gea and 7m for Navas that's a 15m deal.
Nah we have Navas... Oh yeah.Real Madrid probably isn't too bothered, I doubt Man UTd would be as well unless Van Gaal somehow holds a grudge on De Gea and Valdes and keep playing Romerlol
You talking the deal going through now but finalized in Jan?Actually come to think of it, if the deal went through theres no reason why Navas couldnt be registered to play straight away.
The talk was that the deal would go through but neither keeper would be registered to play until January.You talking the deal going through now but finalized in Jan?
If so RM wouldn't be without a GK.