Review Geelong defeats Gold Coast by 120 points @KP

Remove this Banner Ad

No his not. Half his wage goes to the taxman. Interest rates are at record lows at the moment and barely covering inflation. And he has fifty plus years to live off his footy income if he doesnt get another good job. Not likely to be a commentator or coach given his personality. Could very easily be broke by the time he is in his fifties like his old man.
He's a fair bit smarter than the old man God bless him,do you really you think Gaz Jr would have his money sitting in a bank earning a miserable 3%? No I didn't think so.;)
 
He's a fair bit smarter than the old man God bless him,do you really you think Gaz Jr would have his money sitting in a bank earning a miserable 3%? No I didn't think so.;)
I don't think he has the same vices the old man had either....
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What did we make of Bews game? Thought he competed well and was actually really composed when the ball was coming in, his defensive marking and positioning was really good I thought.

That being said he looked panicked ball in hand often opting for a short kick to someone with better disposal.

Thought he showed some really good signs. though.
I thought he was good early when it was a bit of a contest,but like everyone else hard to judge their game after quarter time.
 
No his not. Half his wage goes to the taxman. Interest rates are at record lows at the moment and barely covering inflation. And he has fifty plus years to live off his footy income if he doesnt get another good job. Not likely to be a commentator or coach given his personality. Could very easily be broke by the time he is in his fifties like his old man.
Goodness me, give me two million in the bank (I assume he has more) and see how I'm going by the end of the year.

Even if you only invested in dividend stocks, or rental property, you'd still be making a cool $75k-100k per year.
 
What did we make of Bews game? Thought he competed well and was actually really composed when the ball was coming in, his defensive marking and positioning was really good I thought.

That being said he looked panicked ball in hand often opting for a short kick to someone with better disposal.

Thought he showed some really good signs. though.

Under a bit of pressure to get everything right I thought he did good. Far better than some of his other offerings. Was it perfect? - Far from it - but im confident that between he and Ruggles we can get a decent small defender... or two....:D

GO Catters
 
GEELONG v GOLD COAST
10 Joel Selwood (Geel)
8 Patrick Dangerfield (Geel)
3 Mark Blicavs (Geel)
3 Dan Menzel (Geel)
3 Steven Motlop (Geel)
2 Jimmy Bartel (Geel)
1 Lachie Henderson (Geel)

Not a single vote to Hawkins.
 
GEELONG v GOLD COAST
10 Joel Selwood (Geel)
8 Patrick Dangerfield (Geel)
3 Mark Blicavs (Geel)
3 Dan Menzel (Geel)
3 Steven Motlop (Geel)
2 Jimmy Bartel (Geel)
1 Lachie Henderson (Geel)

Not a single vote to Hawkins.
Pfft.....WTF do coaches know about footy ?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

GEELONG v GOLD COAST
10 Joel Selwood (Geel)
8 Patrick Dangerfield (Geel)
3 Mark Blicavs (Geel)
3 Dan Menzel (Geel)
3 Steven Motlop (Geel)
2 Jimmy Bartel (Geel)
1 Lachie Henderson (Geel)

Not a single vote to Hawkins.

Thanks for these - Hawkins very unlucky, maybe he should have been more selfish in front of goal
 
Truly unbelievable!!
Wonder if Tom Hawkins reacted like this when he found out he didn't get a vote

TerrificHappyBagworm.gif
 
Wonder if Tom Hawkins reacted like this when he found out he didn't get a vote

TerrificHappyBagworm.gif

Maybe that was Scott's expression when he realised he'd left Tomahawk out of his votes. :p
 
As I did after the Essendon game, I went through the replay and noted down our centre square combinations again just to provide a bit of extra data to interpret. Derive whatever conclusions you want from this information; the most obvious difference between the combinations versus Gold Coast compared to the ones against Essendon is that we utilised Blicavs on a wing against the Bombers, so the role change made a massive difference to the composition of mids we used.

I'd be fine doing this for every match if enough people find this a useful resource.

Geelong Centre Square Combinations vs. Gold Coast

Q1:

20.00 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Guthrie
18.45 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Guthrie
18.06 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Duncan
12.19 - Vardy, Dangerfield, Guthrie, Caddy
11.14 - Vardy, Dangerfield, Guthrie, Cockatoo
7.46 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs
6.05 - Smith, Selwood, Caddy, Blicavs
4.25 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs
3.28 - Vardy, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs

Q2:

20.00 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs
18.28 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs
17.27 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs
16.14 - Smith, Blicavs, Duncan, Cockatoo
15.10 - Vardy, Selwood, Duncan, Caddy
10.56 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Motlop
9.56 - Smith, Dangerfield, Blicavs, Motlop
6.39 - Smith, Blicavs, Motlop, Menzel
6.11 - Vardy, Selwood, Caddy, Motlop

Q3:

20.00 - Smith, Selwood, Blicavs, Duncan
18.33 - Smith, Selwood, Blicavs, Duncan
18.06 - Smith, Selwood, Blicavs, Duncan
15.55 - Smith, Selwood, Blicavs, Caddy
13.53 - Vardy, Dangerfield, Blicavs, Caddy
13.08 - Vardy, Dangerfield, Selwood, Caddy
5.00 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs
2.25 - Vardy, Blicavs, Caddy, Menzel
1.20 - Smith, Blicavs, Caddy, Menzel

Q4:

20.00 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs
19.37 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs
14.02 - Vardy, Selwood, Caddy, Cockatoo
13.11 - Vardy, Dangerfield, Caddy, Cockatoo
12.22 - Vardy, Dangerfield, Caddy, Cockatoo
7.50 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs
6.20 - Smith, Selwood, Duncan, Cockatoo
5.30 - Smith, Selwood, Duncan, Menzel
0.27 - Smith, Dangerfield, Selwood, Blicavs

Center Bounce Attendences:

Smith: 25/36
Vardy: 11/36

Selwood: 25/36
Dangerfield: 22/36
Blicavs: 22/36
Caddy: 12/36
Duncan: 8/36
Cockatoo: 6/36
Guthrie: 4/36
Menzel: 4/36
Motlop: 4/36
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top