Search results for query: *

Last AFL I’m going to see.

Should be we are staying together?

Thanks

Suma Magic came up with a more correct points system. Starts with pick 1 being 4500 points.

With all this you need to look deeper. The women who choose their career over a family generally earn more money. Therefore, there is little to no gender discrimination. Major factor is being a primary care given has a negative impact on income. Generally, women are the primary caregiver.

https://www.vox.com/2018/2/19/17018380/gender-wage-gap-childcare-penalty Shows what you are looking for. Mens wages are not affected by having children, while women are. What would be interesting to see the Primary Caregiver vs other parent, especially in Lesbian relationships.

100%. With a bye a week it gives opportunities for more Monday, Thursday and public holidays. Another thing you can massive reduce the number of 6 day breaks, and get rid of teams playing 2 games in 12 day period. 19 teams equal to 38 byes in 24 rounds. Example might be Derby Monday with...

Men with children, can you give reasons how this occurs?

https://images.app.goo.gl/LaNXRE9GzcbGdJKM7

Freo play in Victoria for two games and West Coast play two games in WA.

Fremantle is playing back games in Adelaide. To reduce travel could we play back to back games in other states?

I know WCE fans say 3 years, and they talk about all the young talent. Not all glitters are gold.

Sounds like the wiz.

Pickett was a great pick up the Dees. Sure, they lost Serong but you could argue they won the flag because of addressing a need.

Four of the free kicks were holding the ball. Three of them the player took two steps, got tackled and didn’t correctly disposal the ball. All three of those was a lack of awareness from Acres. The fourth holding the ball Blues player was on the ground and dragged the ball in. Didn’t get...

Mistaking can happen, I'm ok with that. The umpire could have heard only "you ******* idiot". When the umpires say to Pearce when questioned, we didn't hear it. Then I have a real issue with that.

When reporter say its reported or it is understood, it's bs. The fact he gave details is no proof but its more believable. The reporter is no friend of Fremantle and is on the payroll of the AFL.

It doesn't matter, they didn't hear it.

So, Ralph made it up or Pearce was lying? 1. Banfield and Holland one on one, Holland his arms around Banfield. 2. Acres marks a touch ball and takes two steps and get tackles and ball knocked out of his hands. 3. Amiss and McGovern one on one, frontal contact and Switta kicks the goal. Didn't...

He didn’t abuse the umpire. Keep reading back.

It happens all the time with negative articles from the AFL website. Very unprofessional and shows how Micky Mouse the AFL is run.

Basketball Coaches do all the time. Not in the same way it could be abused in the AFL. Coach wants to call a time out to slow down a run. The ball comes from hands which is the most difficult for a hands for umpire. The coach challenges is taking their change to get back their time out. They...

I think there be a danger for a team to be in front and they call for a review. The request is tactical and allowing them to set up behind the ball. There needs a risk to the team challenging.

Seems like Jordan was chatting too much to the umpires during the game, and they wanted revenge.

I like the idea. If you lose a challenge its 50m plus you lose a chance for another challenge.

If my aunty had balls, she would be a coal miner. Jackson hitting ball in the corridor and Treacy drop mark were mistakes. Who knows what would have happened, if they executed. The unpaid mark on the wing, and the touched ball mark being reward, certainly affected the result. Jordan's dissert...

Let's say Jordan is lying. Umpire didn't hear what he said. So, they reward a free plus a free kick for dissent, on the bases of Jordan looking angry.

How is it dissent if the umpire didn't hear what JORDAN SAID?