Search results for query: *

Because Fremantle and West Coast already have reduced access to academy players due to the eligibility rules.

The Norm Smith medalist is Western Australian. What is the issue?

The only Eagles player that would be any interest for Melbourne would be Jack Darling. Yes he had a bad season (but still had the same number of games/goals as Van Rooyen - but he had an injury interrupted pre-season, clearly played injured for a number of matches and was playing as a forward...

The league has major faults which can be improved on but it is still enjoyable to watch.

When West Coast joined the league we had priority access to Western Australian talent - all clubs in the league agreed with this and were aware of the rules. This advantage was removed. Why?

Agreed. Since all the Victorians are so concerned about Harley being forced to move, we should get rid of the draft completely. Arguably it is against Australian employment laws anyway

$45 wouldn’t even get you a seat to watch the worst AFL team this century

if that happens we should fund some sucker to take the draft system to court. Burn the whole thing down.

Contracted until 2027 and while we need to rebuild, you still need a foundation to build on. Do not sell unless we get offered significantly over his value

The AFL doesn’t particularly want a team in Tasmania. There is only a license because Tasmania pushed for it and the AFL set higher requirements than what applied for Gold Coast and GWS

At one stage we were really close to p/r between VFL and VFA (which had p/r)

Why would the AFL fund the stadium?

Worth every ******* cent

Every 4 years have a small tournament - with states rotating the hosts. Sort of like a world cup.

If Harley Reid flies, the club should fund a sucker to take the draft system to court. Worked in the NRL

The only push for WA3 is eastern staters wanting 20 teams

The draft and salary caps already serve to prevent West Coast from getting too powerful. West Coast has won like, what 4 matches in the last 18 months?

Well if the MCG is neutral then yeah

What do you think about Geelong hosting the big Melbourne teams in Melbourne?

Get him to sign a waiver accepting all responsibility then

The federal government has already allocated money for Tasmanian health and education. If Tassie wants more - eg another hospital they need to come up with a proposal and make an application. It’s extremely dubious to pretend that the money for the stadium is money that would otherwise be...

I guess Freo got spooked because they didn’t want the Eagles to get him

Then they recruited Hale, waited two years for him to get used to the club and proceeded to threepeat. He then retired and they haven't looked close since. Imagine if they drafted him in 2002?

St Kilda were invited into the VFL solely because of the Junction Oval

The only thing this stadium is waiting on is the Feds and whatever money the Feds spend on this stadium wasn't going to spent on hospitals and schools in Tassie.

Adelaide - McLeod Brisbane - Brown Carlton - Murphy Collingwood - Buckley Essendon - Hird Fremantle - Pavlich Geelong - Selwood Gold Coast - Lynch GWS - Cameron Hawthorn - Mitchell Melbourne - Gawn North Melbourne - Harvey Port Adelaide - Tredrea Richmond - Richardson St Kilda -...

20 teams, 4 double up matches and a bye which means 23 matches per team. The extra round is regional/country round where every match is played at a country venue

I wonder if North might go the Albury route once they stop playing games in Hobart

Only ever see eastern staters advocating for WA3

How does Carlton implement this model when a Carlton fan can walk up and attend 6-7 "Away" games for $25 each?