Search results for query: *

Would end up something like... Mckercher, Duursma, Goad, Dawson, Hardeman V Mckercher, Caddy, Curtin, Hardeman Simplified: Duursma, Dawson, Goad V Caddy, Curtin On top 7 talent it appears break even in the simplest of comparisons, with Duursma and Curtin winning their prospective match ups...

Say what you want about trading out 3rd rounder for a future 4th, at least it wasn't as bad as Out: 14, 27, 35 In: 11 Only to find out WC ain't interested in your 6 and 11 combo.

Nice Reid knowing West Coast got shafted at every turn.

Deal misses Duursma & Watson. Left with Sanders, Curtin. Unless they went Duursma @ 2, then caught Sanders, Curtin at 5,6 to end up addressing all thirds of the ground.

Mackay FA meant * pick moved back one spot. * then traded 31 to move up one spot. Ergo, Landing Mackay cost them 1.5mill in cap and pick 31

Wanted pick 4, didn't get it. Wanted pick 11, didn't get it. North owe them nothing. Enough evidence the "we won't bid" for getting something in return is BF fantasy.

It's a hypothetical trade scenario expanding on the post i quoted. Not to say I prefer to trade or to hold myself, I don't have a strong opinion one way or another. Was hoping someone might offer more of an insight on Duursma V Caddy+Osullivan actually. If you or anyone else here thinks they...

Reasonable preference, something like: 3, 18 for 6, 11. Then 11, 17 for 8. 2, 6, 8, 15 Duursma, 17, 18 vs Caddy, Osullivan Thoughts?

Worst case: North out: 15, 19 North In: 10 Best case: North out : 15, 26 North In: 4 Both scenarios are two bites vs one though.

Mckercher debut at 16

At some point a death ride will hit the jackpot.

We needed to have the Crows fixture, with WC v Suns. Would've been hilarious to see Tex v Larkey for the battle of the Coleman.

What's bullshit? What should've the AFL done to assist North more than 3 end of first rounds and a generous compo?

With the CBA increase, I doubt anybody but a legitimate star of the competition will be netting band 1 going fwd. Afl need to declare as much. "Compo will not be "purchased" by what a panel may deem as buying a higher compensation."

People need to realise this for what it was. AFL gave us pick 3. They used this years salary to cook the books. If they were assholes the rule change would've been brought in BEFORE North benefited. Other than give us a round one PP, what else could they have done this year? Three picks and...

'WC need to receive 'a free 1st rounder.' If they are absolutely hell Bent on Reid, and noone allows us to trade our late picks up. Then split 3 into 6 & 11. But keep 6. North: 1, 6, 15, 17, 18 WC : 2, 11, 23 Absolute worst case a swap of picks 18, and 23. North : 1, 6, 15, 17, 23 WC : 2...

Pick 3 vs Pick 6 and 8? Split 3 for 6, 11. Then 11 & 18 for 7 or 8. Mckercher, + 2 of Caddy, Osullivan, Curtin V Mckercher, Duursma If Duursma is rated that highly, go tall across the park, Duursma, + two talls. Tall stocks : Larkey.....Logue....abyss. Draft a Mckercher with the top 5...

First, we have to accept that statistically, Australia churns out 'x' number of decent draft prospects per year. Over long term, let's assume the number is consistent. It is generally accepted the closer to pick 1, the higher the potential. The people devaluing picks after FS, are simply...

^Send this to the club, looks heaps better than the current system...

Souup said you don't take Caddy once you have Duursma. But also, come on....the talls. The cupboards bare. Larkey and Logue soon turn 26. The bet would be, is the difference between Duursma and Caddy greater than another top 10 pick on the list. Same question could be asked of Reid, IF, you...

Pick 3, or two of Watto, Curtin, Osullivan, Caddy? 3 into 6 & 11. 11 & 18 into 8. 2, 6, 8, 15, 17. Edit. Caught up on prev. Posts, SOUUP is all for Duursma.

Do * have the list spots to split after their Crazy Vossy haul?

Good. Improving on the current body of work moving a future pick into 2023.

He's doing his best to clean up over there.

Agree on all counts. But you're actually understating the delusion their echo chamber's caused. They think 2 AND 3 is unders. They're leaning more towards: 2 and 3 and our F1 2 and 3 and two of 15, 17, 18 2 and 3 and one of 15, 17, 18 To be fair, there's one voice of reason over there...

If these ranking are anything to go by its slim pickings at 15 pushed out to 18 or 19

Brady would need to go into witness protection.