Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This puts a dampener on the day.
Probably.Maybe he is the backup plan if Joel Tippett is taken in the PSD?
CARLTON has denied former Bomber Kyle Reimers is training with the club, despite his name appearing on the updated 'permission to train' list
Reimers name appeared on the AFL's latest list on Tuesday afternoon.
Reimers manager Alex McDonald confirmed the player was not training with Carlton and an AFL spokesman said he would look into the matter.
Last resort backup plan...Back up plan to the back up plans back up plan is where he should be.
Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggghhhhhhhhhh
Clicked on the link and went through to a Reimers not with the Blues article...
Yeah, nah. We missed the boat on that one. Collingwood were the obvious contender in need of a ruck and they instead are going with a 34yo in Ben Hudson. So it turns out Warnock is worth less than the pick 18 at which many thought Grundy was a bargain.
The ruck rule changes will make Warnock a most valuable player. As a pure ruckman he is our number 1 man. IMO Kruezer is going to have to improve as a key position player if he is to get significant game time.
I don't think the rule changes will do as much for Warnock as some seem to suggest. In fact I think it probably helps Hampson more than Warnock.
Warnock was already good in the ruck, in fact I'd go as far as to say he's our best pure tap ruckman. However when considering the whole package, inclusive of ruck work and ability to impact around the ground, both Kreuzer and Hampson leave Warnock for dead. The new ruck rules won't change that.
The only thing that will change for Warnock is that he can no longer be easily pushed out of position in ruck contests so he can use his height to advantage. That's a plus for him for sure but it remains important that ruckmen can have an impact around the ground and even forward, which Warnock simply cannot.
The no-contact rule may help him slightly but all things considered he remains, in my mind at least, the clear 3rd choice ruckman at the club.
Your opinion of Warnock is balanced and, in the main, does not differ much from my own. We both think he is our best tap ruckman and we both agree his around the ground work is not at the level of K or H. My approach is a simple one. A footballer might be a great mark and a big body but if he cannot beat his man in a 1 on 1 contest he cannot play as a backman (i.e. Thornton). So for a defender, the first requirement is that he can consistently spoil his direct opponent (like McInnes can (could) but White can't).I don't think the rule changes will do as much for Warnock as some seem to suggest. In fact I think it probably helps Hampson more than Warnock.
Warnock was already good in the ruck, in fact I'd go as far as to say he's our best pure tap ruckman. However when considering the whole package, inclusive of ruck work and ability to impact around the ground, both Kreuzer and Hampson leave Warnock for dead. The new ruck rules won't change that.
The only thing that will change for Warnock is that he can no longer be easily pushed out of position in ruck contests so he can use his height to advantage. That's a plus for him for sure but it remains important that ruckmen can have an impact around the ground and even forward, which Warnock simply cannot.
The no-contact rule may help him slightly but all things considered he remains, in my mind at least, the clear 3rd choice ruckman at the club.
Warnock proved himself in 2011. He played very well in the big games, particularly against Geelong (which we lost because he was knocked unconscious) and Ess and WC in the finals - on his own. Warnock does the first thing required of a ruckman - he beats his opponent to the ball in the ruck contest more often than K or H. Thus he is our first ruck (IMO). Around the ground, meh, what are midfielders for?
Versatile ruckmen go forward and kick goals.Warnock does the first thing required of a ruckman - he beats his opponent to the ball in the ruck contest more often than K or H. Thus he is our first ruck (IMO). Around the ground, meh, what are midfielders for?
IMO Kruezer is going to have to improve as a key position player if he is to get significant game time.
Small forward??Last resort backup plan...
Why would we even need Reimers? He hasnt kicked enough goals as a small forward to even play a serious part in our forward line. Seriously... that article has to be a ******* joke...
Heard rumour that Carlton officials spotted at Essendon training.
Looking at.......?
My guess - Garlett. (or maybe Colqhuon)