Clark would now be retired, and possibly may have been even earlier depending on the circumstances...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hendo would have stayed if it wasn't for Fev. Hendo and Clark would have been a solid forward line if we decided to give Clark a pay rise and we wouldn't need to be recruiting talls with our first pick.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hendo would have stayed if it wasn't for Fev. Hendo and Clark would have been a solid forward line if we decided to give Clark a pay rise and we wouldn't need to be recruiting talls with our first pick.
If Hendo wasnt average they wouldnt have chased Fev. He is not a 1st round quality
If Hendo wasnt average they wouldnt have chased Fev. He is not a 1st round quality
Clark didnt deserve a pay rise which the demons offered... play one good season as ruck
We certainly needed the talls, but our draft policy of taking them early has failed.
Need mids...we will have a better chance getting elite players in...mids can play small forward, mid, small defender.
Talls need to be exceptional if we use 1st round picks
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Clark would now be retired, and possibly may have been even earlier depending on the circumstances...
Sliding doors.
Hendo might have stayed and done 3ACL's and Clark mightn't have had so many foot injuries and been a star....or not....or both .....or neither.
We can only play with the cards we've been dealt and there's no point whatsoever in dreaming about hypotheticals,
Wasn't Hendo just offered up as trade bait for Fev without his knowledge?
That seemed to be what happened to both Bradshaw and Riska.
The BF draft watchers seem to think that this year's crop of mids is pretty weak, particularly at the top end.If Hendo wasnt average they wouldnt have chased Fev. He is not a 1st round quality
Clark didnt deserve a pay rise which the demons offered... play one good season as ruck
We certainly needed the talls, but our draft policy of taking them early has failed.
Need mids...we will have a better chance getting elite players in...mids can play small forward, mid, small defender.
Talls need to be exceptional if we use 1st round picks
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Berger left? Henderson couldnt be traded out quick enough. Spllandermann (delist), wood (trade), Longer (poor selection considering ruck depth at the time)
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
u wot.
Hendo was in his third year if i remember correctly and showed plenty of promise as a forward and defender. He knew he wouldn't get any games if Fev joined so he asked to leave, you can't blame him. It's laughable that you think he's not first round quality.
Clark also showed so much potential as a forward in his last year with us, especially when Brown went down and he became our number one target. He deserved a pay rise since he showed that he can become A grade in two positions, although he isn't worth what the Demons offered him, it was 200+ more than what Freo were offering? I'd still offer what he was asking originally from us (450K?)
I'd usually say midfielders only first but we're in desperate need for a tall. This year's group has a few promising types with different strengths and weaknesses in the top ten so i'm hoping we can grab one and focus on other needs later in the draft.
Wasn't Hendo just offered up as trade bait for Fev without his knowledge?
That seemed to be what happened to both Bradshaw and Riska.
We have Zorko, Green, Mayes, Hanley, Beams and Taylor in the middle or on the wings at times. Taylor will be there more and more often. I think Lester is genuinely slow, but the others you listed aren't particularly slow, they just aren't line breaking speedsters.I am over talk of us chasing a key forward with our early picks, we need to address lack of speed in the midfield. We could quite possibly have the slowest midfield in the comp. Rockliff, Redden, Moloney, Lester, Aish & Rich ( who isn't the quickest but breaks the lines with is penetrating kicks ) are all ball winners but slow. Our only quick mid would be Zorko. If Yeo & Docherty were still at the club I think it would of helped us release Hanley into the middle this season. Ideally we get pick 2 or 3 and get the gun we need or we do what Melbourne did this year, but to a better extent.
You can build a decent side while not using your first couple of picks all that well. Look at Freo and Sydney. But they are both much better run off the field than our club is.
Those figures do sound right. Wasn't Clark originally asking 500 k from us to stay and we didn't pay because "we only gave that kind of money for performance and not potential"? Also wasn't aware we were overpaying for Hooper. Any ideas how much ?Weren't the figures something like Melbourne offering $800k, Freo offering $600k and us not being able to match either because we were overpaying the likes of Brennan, Hooper, etc, thanks to Gubby's salary cap rogering? Too hard to look it up on an iPad, but the impression I got was that he wan't even considering our offers because Freo's was so much better plus going home.
Hilariously part of the reason Hendo suggested being part of the trade was so he could be a KPF at Carlton, because if he'd been ok with a KPD role he could've stayed here - we'd played him there a bit already. And he ended up being a KPD there... I think he was worth where we drafted him, but he's never going to be a true KPF and so isn't exactly a solution to our current woes. He'd be roughly equivalent to what we get from moving Merrett forward.
Nope, Hendo volunteered to go after Riska knocked back Carlton because they wanted to re-sign him to a longer deal as part of changing clubs. Suspicious given the Suns' contract one year later.
Those figures do sound right. Wasn't Clark originally asking 500 k from us to stay and we didn't pay because "we only gave that kind of money for performance and not potential"? Also wasn't aware we were overpaying for Hooper. Any ideas how much ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sounds a bit stupid when you only pay for performance and not potential and then we over pay Hooper. Clark was a good player bordering on very good and Melbourne got to see some of his potential before he retired.
Just to be clear guys this year is far and away the weakest I have seen for small / medium types and one of the deapest for KPs. The key positions are not at the same level as Boyd, Hogan, Daniher but there are quite a few at the level below. If we were ever going to load up on KPs this is the year as there is very little in the way of smalls to tempt us away.
On pace I think our current group doesn't have terrible pace I think they just lack the running ability to make full use of what they have.