What I don't get is that race officials knew 5 laps into the race. Why then let him race for another 52 laps and 6 hours later DQ him? Shambles from both sides and poor Dan was stuck in the middle.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The polar opposite of trippin' balls?This sucks arse.
So as I read that, the officials recognised there were issues with the sensor but thought near enough was good enough with the readings the sensor was showing. Because they chose to go down the suck it up path rather than acknowledge the issue and allow the alternate method, Red Bull find themselves in this position.
In the end, yeah ******* stupid by Red Bull to challenge officialdom but one person saying hey there's an issue with the sensor use the alternate method is the difference between second spot and a DQ.
Again, what confuses me is, i thought the tanks could only be filled to pretty much last the duration of the race plus an in lap, out lap and formation lap. If he was using too much fuel, wouldn't he just run out of fuel?
When this season and his dominance unravels its going to get very ugly.And some on here still want to defend him.
.
A higher rate, means Dan could benefit from extra power. That power could've helped him hold off Magnussen, for instance.I don't understand why flow rate matters so much
Just say this is the size fuel tank you can have. If you aren't economical enough to finish the race, tough t***ies
Seb's vent on team radio to his engineers when his car failed:
"Do something!"
"That's ridiculous guys!"
And some on here still want to defend him.
It's no wonder he gets booed.
A higher rate, means Dan could benefit from extra power. That power could've helped him hold off Magnussen, for instance.
I imagine that normally it wouldn't, but with an extra formation lap and safety car periods, they would've had more fuel to play with than they would've thought. And if Dan was able to use a higher fuel flow rate than the others, that would obviously mean more power with that extra fuel.I'm not totally across the minutia of this, but I would have thought that since the cars are not refuelled during the race, it shouldn't matter what the fuel rate is if they all have the same amount of fuel to get them to the end.
Notwithstanding the fact that rules are rules.
I imagine that normally it wouldn't, but with an extra formation lap and safety car periods, they would've had more fuel to play with than they would've thought. And if Dan was able to use a higher fuel flow rate than the others, that would obviously mean more power with that extra fuel.
Well the sensor was changed on Saturday night.One question is, surely the stewards would have noticed this issue in qualifying. Conspiracy theory tells me though that they did, but let it be as they wanted the publicity of the local lad on the front row of the grid.
Whilst rules are rules I dont see how it matters. It SHOULD be fill the car up to the 100kgs and use it as you wish. However those are not the rules and I cant see how they can win the arguement.A higher rate, means Dan could benefit from extra power. That power could've helped him hold off Magnussen, for instance.
If he'd driven the whole race with that fuel flow, yes. I'm assuming that high fuel flow was just at times, like when he got told to turn the engine up.http://www.news.com.au/sport/motors...ys-paul-stoddart/story-fnec578q-1226856108983
Maybe I'm not as stupid as I thought. Paul Stoddart seems to think if the fuel rate was excessive, Dan would have run out of fuel.