I will explain the fumble rule. When kelce got tackled, he did not have clear control of the ball . The ball started to move long before his knee made contact with the ground. That there is what is ruled as a fumble. Im not sure if people have watched the video clearly, the last 5 seconds before kelce gets taken to the ground the ball had started to become loose,he did not show maintaining control of the ball through the tackling motion.
You need to provide a backstory for those who haven't seen it.
The official's blew the Kelce play just like they blew the Browner hit. Neither were correct calls and unfortunately for the Chiefs, it may cost them a playoff spot.
They've been calling Browner type hits like that for years now. I prefer that sort of consistency (Especially when the violent hit ruling typifies the hit as either head OR neck area).
Yeah I thought that was a typical QB call, despite being downfield.
It's either helmet to helmet which it wasn't (the footage clearly shows it wasn't H2H) or it's a hit on a defenceless receiver which it couldn't have been as Green was juggling the football trying to catch it. It was a s**t call and continues the NFL's policy of removing good, hard football play from NFL defences.
Regardless of which, that is called 100% of the time. In real time, you can't blame the refs for calling it, and they've called similar plays like that for years, rightly or wrongly. Consistency trumps pedantics.
Ahhhhh, the defence of an ignoramus with nothing intelligible to say.
Trucking is R3 up?
