- Nov 7, 2010
- 26,865
- 35,536
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- WADA
I'm sure we will find something.But if we can't complain about players being injured all the time then what else are we supposed to complain about?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sure we will find something.But if we can't complain about players being injured all the time then what else are we supposed to complain about?
Judging by the NIB medical room we are stuck with this useless "short term/medium term/long term" taxonomy for the foreseeable future.
Apparently Balme has taken it to Collingwood too.
I know it's novel Daz, but we could just do as 16 other clubs and report our best estimate in weeks. Is it that hard?We didn't like 2-3 weeks.
Short, medium, long term is not good either apparently.
Can we use Parsecs?… or is that distance rather than time…
im so confused…
Go Catters
So no mention of Rhys Stanley and his bone bruising?Injuries 25/03
Clark - Thumb is fine he's ready to go
Bates - Will play in a practice match, has been running for a month
Smedts- Back at training, had a sore back after a tackle.
Thurlow - Starting contact work now.
Menzel - Finishing of his hammy rehab, should be ok to start training again soon
Vardy - started contact work now, recovering well
McCarthy - Starting Rehab after successful surgery
Delany - Running now will start rehab after a successful surgery at Xmas.
Injuries 25/03
Clark - Thumb is fine he's ready to go
Bates - Will play in a practice match, has been running for a month
Smedts- Back at training, had a sore back after a tackle.
Thurlow - Starting contact work now.
Menzel - Finishing of his hammy rehab, should be ok to start training again soon
Vardy - started contact work now, recovering well
McCarthy - Starting Rehab after successful surgery
Delany - Running now will start rehab after a successful surgery at Xmas.
We didn't like 2-3 weeks.
Short, medium, long term is not good either apparently.
Can we use Parsecs?… or is that distance rather than time…
im so confused…
Go Catters
So no mention of Rhys Stanley and his bone bruising?
Does that mean that he's right to go for next week too, or are the club hiding his injury by not mentioning it? I guess we'll know when the VFL side against Collingwood is named later this week.
I know it's novel Daz, but we could just do as 16 other clubs and report our best estimate in weeks. Is it that hard?
So no mention of Rhys Stanley and his bone bruising?
Does that mean that he's right to go for next week too, or are the club hiding his injury by not mentioning it? I guess we'll know when the VFL side against Collingwood is named later this week.
Hmmmm....after reading that list I'mHere's the URL for our updated injury list (dated Monday March 23rd) on afl.com.au.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/injury-news/injury-list
Actually sounds less positive than the Medical Room update on pretty much everyone (Vardy excepted, perhaps).
But this info does at least provide some supposed clarity on expected return dates.
And sadly Stanley is (back) on the list.
I don't agree Daz. You can't build your communications strategy for fear of the reactions of the irrational and ill-informed.And what will the first reaction when player X takes longer than the Y weeks specified.
Pitchforks, torches and the club is lying to us. ( not you per se but you get the point).
I get both sides but again, damned if they do, damned if they don't.
GO Catters
Which is fair enough. The BS approach the club has adopted invites and encourages speculation.Hmmmm....after reading that list I'm
thinking the AFL are having a guess at our
Hmmmm....after reading that list I'm
thinking the AFL are having a guess at our new injury reporting strategy with;
Short Term ~1-3 wks,
Medium Term ~4-7 wks.
Here's the URL for our updated injury list (dated Monday March 23rd) on afl.com.au.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/injury-news/injury-list
Actually sounds less positive than the Medical Room update on pretty much everyone (Vardy excepted, perhaps).
But this info does at least provide some supposed clarity on expected return dates.
And sadly Stanley is (back) on the list.
Which is fair enough. The BS approach the club has adopted invites and encourages speculation.
Yeah, I agree. As we all will be.Yep ,I agree wholeheartedly. My point was that I noticed that the players who had been placed in the short term category,had 1-3 wks against their names,and the players in the medium category had 4-7 wks against their names.
Hence why I thought the AFL might have been having a stab in the dark.
That's one point of view, but to play the devil's advocate is there any obligation to follow the rest? Do they have to follow like sheep? Again the player involved will not heal any faster no matter how they report on the injury list.I know it's novel Daz, but we could just do as 16 other clubs and report our best estimate in weeks. Is it that hard?
That's my way of thinking Daz. Can't placate everyone. Like you say damned if you do, damned if you don't.And what will the first reaction when player X takes longer than the Y weeks specified.
Pitchforks, torches and the club is lying to us. ( not you per se but you get the point).
I get both sides but again, damned if they do, damned if they don't.
GO Catters
Yep and on the NIB Medical video on the Geelong website they also say that Zac is ready to go, has been in normal training for the past month, and will play our next practice match. So potentially the info on the AFL website is a bit out of date?That is in stark contrast to the club I'm afraid.
This was a reply on the same day as what you have posted:
View attachment 118735
The afl injury list for us was updated last on Monday of this week. By Wednesday he's off the injury list. Must have been close.Yep and on the NIB Medical video on the Geelong website they also say that Zac is ready to go, has been in normal training for the past month, and will play our next practice match. So potentially the info on the AFL website is a bit out of date?
They didn't even mention Stanley so suspect he's not considered as being on the injury list.