Depending on who you ask, 193cm. 18 year olds sometimes grow half an inch after drafting.Plowman is only 191cm, I don't think he is suited to a key position.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depending on who you ask, 193cm. 18 year olds sometimes grow half an inch after drafting.Plowman is only 191cm, I don't think he is suited to a key position.
I advocated trading out high currency picks/players for depth of contributors. I stressed on numerous occasions that I wasn't being specific about which players or picks to trade, but from a strategic stand point, we needed to address our lack of depth of contributors with priority.Mynameisgeoff posts absolute dribble. Same bloke that wanted to trade our picks for depth players. Your critiqueing of that list is bang on. We have a way to go. But another good step taken last night.
Pound for pound each one of those Pies players would get schoolyard picked over the Carlton counterpart.
Cripps is going to be a bloody good star, but Treloar already is. At worst you call it dead even.
As for the rest, it's either the Collingwood player or a draw. De Goey and Byrne is no contest. Grundy is a developed ruckman vs a just recruited rookie (in terms of years not rookie list)... not really a comparison. Crisp and Kerridge? No contest right now. You'd have Moore over Jaksch every day of the week, he's going to be a very good player. Adams is way better than Graham is now and probably going to be.
Completely agree, we need to churn through a heap of cat A. rookies to unearth some gems.The rookie draft has proven to be a well to tap for talent in the brave new world of the AFL. I think we haven't quite grasped what is required, high turnover! We have tended to use the rookie draft more to stockpile list cloggers or players pushed out by list cloggers. Would like to see us give players 12 months, they either breakthrough or they are out! We can't hide the Woods of the world on the rookie list. We need to be unearthing talent missed by the draft or slower blooming. Not expecting much here because most of the spots are taken.
the team avg height would have increased with trades & draftPlowman looks 192/193 and not 191.
Small difference on face value but could be a lot on-field.
Hard to gauge what his reach is like but he has nice movement and fair pace.
the team avg height would have increased with trades & draft
is this visible in the training track - yet?
Nope you still talk dribble. It was picks you wanted to trade. You never mentioned players. Even Number 1 was on the table. The only one retracting now is you.I advocated trading out high currency picks/players for depth of contributors. I stressed on numerous occasions that I wasn't being specific about which players or picks to trade, but from a strategic stand point, we needed to address our lack of depth of contributors with priority.
Silvagni did exactly that. Traded out currency (menzel) and addressed the lack of depth of immediate contributors (kerridge, plowman, sumner, lamb, Phillips). He reportedly also tried to trade pick 8 for Tomlinson.
Unless you think silvagni is talking dribble you should probably retract that comment
Go back and see your dribble around oct 3rd and 4th. You got hammered with your strange 150 list. Your quick fix is garbage.I advocated trading out high currency picks/players for depth of contributors. I stressed on numerous occasions that I wasn't being specific about which players or picks to trade, but from a strategic stand point, we needed to address our lack of depth of contributors with priority.
Silvagni did exactly that. Traded out currency (menzel) and addressed the lack of depth of immediate contributors (kerridge, plowman, sumner, lamb, Phillips). He reportedly also tried to trade pick 8 for Tomlinson.
Unless you think silvagni is talking dribble you should probably retract that comment
Nope you still talk dribble. It was picks you wanted to trade. You never mentioned players. Even Number 1 was on the table. The only one retracting now is you.
Silvagni did exactly what a lot of us wanted. Trading for top end talent which 4 picks in the 1st round is. Weren't you the one with the rediculous top 150 dribble and saying we should trade pick 1 with dogs for Hrovat and a bunch of other fringe types. Yes it was you.
Hopefully Bolts negotiated for a step ladder in his contract, bloke will have a sore neckthe team avg height would have increased with trades & draft
is this visible in the training track - yet?
I think pure midfields we need now. Between Armfield, Sumner, Lamb, Tutt and Smith - small forwards we have for now. I think Sumner and Smith will be the 2 long term as well. Throw in resting midfielders and we should be good.
18 year olds sometimes grow half an inch after drafting.
If we take a PSD pick we can only take one rookie, otherwise two. I think Holman's gone.I think tht means we take no other players tomorrow. Just upgrade or re-rookie..
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk