Is it official re Dixon? Or just the media jumping the shark?I am not convinced after the year Port had that they would be too quick to release a first rounder. I think they will be chasing a Mid by what Kern was hinting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it official re Dixon? Or just the media jumping the shark?I am not convinced after the year Port had that they would be too quick to release a first rounder. I think they will be chasing a Mid by what Kern was hinting.
It just sounds awfully like Sydney.
First, they land a big forward, who isn't actually very good at being a forward. He has a really average year and doesn't justify the price.
Second, they land a real forward, which suddenly leaves the first forward in a bit of a no-man's land.
Port have a far different problem: if Ryder moves into the ruck, suddenly Lobbe is superfluous. Or, they play two tall forwards. But, they still don't know if Ryder will get slapped by CAS. Some very tricky list management going on over there. Plus, after getting Polec and Ryder, they'd probably have to give up a first-round pick for Dixon, and that's three years without one... that'll show in the midfield in five years. Maybe.
He'll request a trade to SeppeltsfieldIt's interesting that Dixon wants to go to Port because of Ken, huge compliment to him.
But what happens when he gets sacked?
Draft picks are over rated.
If Port land Dixon that is well worth a 1st rounder.
Over paid for Ryder but you'd think that Dixon is an upgrade and he is only young.
They'll have done well.
Is it official re Dixon? Or just the media jumping the shark?
Didn't realise Dixon was as old as Walker.I think Port will trade for Dixon but it wouldn't surprise me if its a 2nd rounder this year and 1st rounder next season (on the premise of being able to trade future draft picks). I think this year showed they are too reliant on too few in the middle and need to get some talent. Pick 11 should get them a nice Mid.
Didn't realise Dixon was as old as Walker.
I guess he is an upgrade on shultz still.
Be interesting trade week all the same.
Didn't realise Dixon was as old as Walker.
I guess he is an upgrade on shultz still.
Be interesting trade week all the same.
Caught me by surprise too. The fact he is likely to have 7 to 8 seasons up his sleeve is a bonus. I think its taken him a long time to grow into his body. He is huge. He is at the right age for someone of his height to hit his peak too. I think this makes him very valuable. The only issue is someone of his height is a disadvantage in the hard running of a zone. I cant see him being able to get back in time often enough if the ball escapes the oppositions defensive zone as highlighted by Gold Coasts scoring issues. Schulz has a lot more benefit in his ground coverage due to his running ability.
If Port trade Lobbe they'll end up with basically no ruckman in the event Ryder gets a hefty ban
Well I'm afraid there isn't a single sporting competition in the world with integrity then because no club at any level in any sport goes all in on dead rubbers.My point is, as stated previously, the comp is already inequitable, there's absolutely no need to make it more so. Whatever integrity the game has needs to be kept, not eroded, and allowing this is adding to the farces that already exist.
If Port trade Lobbe they'll end up with basically no ruckman in the event Ryder gets a hefty ban
Watching the Footy Feed on the AFL.com, my god Ross Lyon is a massive flog. Doesn't give 2 shits about anything but himself. If Freo don't win the flag he is short odds to walk out on them.
So you've never read 'The Creed" then?This is probably the dumbest thing I've ever read.
the media jumped the shark years ago.Is it official re Dixon? Or just the media jumping the shark?
Couldnt disagrees more mate but let's agree to disagree.Oh c'mon. That's bullshit is what it is.
We need to change these other inequities before dictating to clubs how they are allowed to manage their teams.My point is, as stated previously, the comp is already inequitable, there's absolutely no need to make it more so. Whatever integrity the game has needs to be kept, not eroded, and allowing this is adding to the farces that already exist.
So we've got two examples of players effectively being "stitched up" whilst the season is still going ... Henderson to Geelong and Dixon to Port, meanwhile the AFL launched an investigation and harassed Eddie whilst he was away at his Grandfathers funeral all because a a bitter sacked coach started throwing grenades. Give me a ******* break!
GC have one and it hasn't helped them much. Though they aren't experiencing an exodus.They need an experienced coach.