- Jun 7, 2011
- 5,147
- 13,284
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
And roll one for after.Roll it 1st.
Position 2015 SuperCoach forwards
- Thread starter Super Hans
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
toxic
Premium Gold
And roll one for after.
Store in freezer on side for chill
What do you think if WADA appeals? Will the affected players be in trouble through the year? I hope not. Paddy has solved my ruc problems..... believe me I have a few
- Feb 1, 2013
- 5,435
- 9,555
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors
I don't think so mate, I think they will be fine. Worst case scenario I have to use one trade mid-late year if it is required. That is no big deal really. The guy is a superstar and in our team he is going to flourish. Probably 40% ruck time and then up forward. 2-3 goals and 20 odd hitouts will result in some very nice scores. Paddy has always been good at the hit outs to advantage as well, so I can see the Ruck scoring changes actually benefiting him.What do you think if WADA appeals? Will the affected players be in trouble through the year? I hope not. Paddy has solved my ruc problems..... believe me I have a few
- Jun 21, 2009
- 26,776
- 33,452
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Is that fat hands Zeke?
ken what?
- Jun 21, 2009
- 26,776
- 33,452
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
ken what?
gotta be an old school BF'er to get it.
What do you think if WADA appeals? Will the affected players be in trouble through the year? I hope not. Paddy has solved my ruc problems..... believe me I have a few
I believe the Asada guy will be having a press conference today. I think it will be fairly clear what way they will go after that. I've had Watson in and out I don't know wtf to do.
I'd be surprised if they let it go. I'll be even more surprised if WADA decides not to rattle their sabres.
This is far from over unfortunately. It is arguably the second biggest doping scandal in the sporting world, I can't see WADA saying, nah, you tried, thats nice. Lets put that little doozy to bed.
Maybe they just need to quit while they are behind. Their name has been dragged through the mud as much as Essendon.
LOL the biggest gift from heaven lands in their lap and they **** it right up. Not as bad as VLAD and the AFL did though!
- Jun 21, 2009
- 26,776
- 33,452
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
.. I joined before you !!!!
You think this is my first account? I pity the noobs
Super Gusto
Club Legend
- Mar 12, 2009
- 1,635
- 134
- AFL Club
- Essendon
The burden of proof is apparently higher in an appeal. If they didn't have enough proof intially after the club opened the doors to them, then I can;t see how they are going to appeal.
Good point. Not as if there are lots of records to go over.......
- Apr 20, 2001
- 27,331
- 10,437
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Utd,Liverpool, WWT Eagles.
Who are you really, and what were you before? What did you do and what did you think, huh?*
*Casablanca tragics will get it.
... gotta be old school BF to get Casablanca references.....
- Apr 20, 2001
- 27,331
- 10,437
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Utd,Liverpool, WWT Eagles.
On appeal they would have to show the tribunal erred in some way. I can't see it being much harder they would just need to see the circumstnatial evidence differently. This all depends on the full reasons of course.
Super Gusto
Club Legend
- Mar 12, 2009
- 1,635
- 134
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Not sure about that. The decision was based on lack of information so I can;t see an appeal being that the the tribunal erred in their understanding of that information.
I'm just going on what ex ASADA boss Richard Ings said last night on ABC - apparently the appeal requires a higher burden of proof.
- Apr 20, 2001
- 27,331
- 10,437
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Utd,Liverpool, WWT Eagles.
Which is what? Comformatble satisfaction was the burnde at the tribunal. THe only answer could be Beyond reasonable doubt and I don't think that's the case. An error could be that the tribunal did not give enough weight to particular evidence eg the stat decs of the chemist and the dobber.
Super Gusto
Club Legend
- Mar 12, 2009
- 1,635
- 134
- AFL Club
- Essendon
It doesn't get much lower that comformable satisfaction.
My understanding was that the stat decs from charters/alvi either couldn;t be submitted or couldn;t carry much weight as they refused to be cross examined.
- Apr 20, 2001
- 27,331
- 10,437
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Utd,Liverpool, WWT Eagles.
Balance of probabilities is lower.
Yes I agree, but the CAS might see it differently. Not saying they would but they might.
- Jun 21, 2009
- 26,776
- 33,452
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Gotta be a old campaigner... gotta be old school BF to get Casablanca references.....
- Status
Similar threads
