Mathieson is probably better all round than Crouch was. Crouch's engine during his draft year was something that saw him slide, as was his poor disposal efficiency and his lack of elite speed. Whereas from what I've read of Mathieson he's solid, without being outstanding by foot and is more like to get the ball in congestion and break free - as opposed to handball or bang it on the boot which Matt Crouch tends to do.For all the TAC cup experts / North Ballarat fans; who was the better player at the same age. Mathieson vs M. Crouch?
Both ball magnet, clearance beasts. Both have issues with their kicking, crouch a little moreso, but arguably had better numbers at the same age.
I've watched a lot of M.Crouch play and very little of Mathieson, but from what I've read of him that seems to be the difference.