manureid
Laziest Poster on Figbooty
How was it stated? India by 7 wickets?Yes, but he conveniently left it until after the match to reveal his prediction
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How was it stated? India by 7 wickets?Yes, but he conveniently left it until after the match to reveal his prediction
India 3/200 def Australia 5/197How was it stated? India by 7 wickets?
Yeh, if he showed that before the game, then impressive, otherwise, nice trick.India 3/200 def Australia 5/197
Think he had the overs in there too
We know exactly what we have and chose not to play our hand a month out. We will be very hard to beat when the time comes.
Very "conveniently".Yes, but he conveniently left it until after the match to reveal his prediction
What a strange way to prepare for a WC.
With just two teams qualifying from the group I'd be surprised if Australia gets through from that.
70% of a t20 is luck, so who knows. However I agree, and it is purely because 4 of our best bowlers are injured.
NCN was very good for Delhi in the last IPL, I'd say he has proven himself a good bowler in the conditions.Starc, Pattinson, Cummins and NCN? The last 3 are unproven in international T20 - they also have limited experience in the subcontinent don't they ? Even with the IPL. I also think it's pointless to include Cummins in these discussions, how many international games has he played since that test in 2011?
I think Cummins has played more international games (Aus A etc) than state games since 2011.Starc, Pattinson, Cummins and NCN? The last 3 are unproven in international T20 - they also have limited experience in the subcontinent don't they ? Even with the IPL. I also think it's pointless to include Cummins in these discussions, how many international games has he played since that test in 2011?
I think luck is only a factor to the extent of how many players turn up to play. As we saw last night one player dominating (Watson) may be good enough to get his team over the line but consistency across the team - as India have shown throughout this series - will more likely than not come out on top.
Bowlers can certainly lose games though and if Boland & Tait are playing we'll be no chance.Bowlers won't win games in this World Cup, batsmen will. I expect scores over 200 to be the norm.
And there isn't any preparation required for a T20 World Cup. The best batting lists will come to the top and then its going to be decided largely by luck. We have a batting list as good as anyone, so we are a chance. IMO of course.
Bowlers won't win games in this World Cup, batsmen will. I expect scores over 200 to be the norm.
And there isn't any preparation required for a T20 World Cup. The best batting lists will come to the top and then its going to be decided largely by luck. We have a batting list as good as anyone, so we are a chance. IMO of course.
Yeah I don't know where this idea that bowlers are somehow less important in high scoring games comes from.Good bowlers are worth their weight in gold when scores are generally high.
Look at Starc in the World Cup.
Yeah I don't know where this idea that bowlers are somehow less important in high scoring games comes from.
I think Cummins has played more international games (Aus A etc) than state games since 2011.
That's insane. How can we even think of him as a Test prospect until he gets a season under his belt.Hasn't played a Shield match in nearly five years!
That's insane. How can we even think of him as a Test prospect until he gets a season under his belt.