- Banned
- #3,826
Bont, macrae, wallis.
Bont you'd think.
Geez, the dogs on paper don't scare me ... yet. Beveridge is a gun coach.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Bont, macrae, wallis.
It could be several players.Bont you'd think.
Geez, the dogs on paper don't scare me ... yet. Beveridge is a gun coach.
They've got some serious class coming through/on, there's no doubt about that.Bont you'd think.
Geez, the dogs on paper don't scare me ... yet. Beveridge is a gun coach.
I'd send him to Macrae. Bont might be a handful to tag as he is very tall.
Fyfe is almost as tall with a big leap and a lot better footballer. Jacobs could do the job if needed.I'd send him to Macrae. Bont might be a handful to tag as he is very tall.
Luke was in. JMac right behind him. Its the most heartening thing to see as a supporter.Btw which North player ripped Fyfe's jumper after the Jacobs hit ??
It was good to see someone "fly the flag"
I wanna see this more often. Gotta stand up to these thugs and change the persona that we are softish.Luke was in. JMac right behind him. Its the most heartening thing to see as a supporter.
Even Swallow got into Fyfe after a centre bounce. Well done boys
One things for sure we have to put a defensive tag on Murphy. He is the catalyst for a lot of their attacks from the HBL.
Yeah like those matchups. Not sure about Atley though, not sure he could go with Dahlhaus in the middle.I'd put Wright on Murphy.
Thompson to Stringer. Tarrant to Redpath. Atley to Dahlhaus. Firrito on Dickson?
Fyfe has been cleared
Judged as insufficient force right? Correct decision imo.Fyfe has been cleared
Once again, a North Player without a flimsy jaw.Judged as insufficient force right? Correct decision imo.
Correct decision.Judged as insufficient force right? Correct decision imo.
Give me a spell it was no big deal.Correct decision.
But doesn't stop me from being extremely pissed off with the AFL!
Ziebell got a week for a clumsy spoil that didn't even hurt the St Kilda player and it was only a few years ago he got multiple weeks for contesting a ball and hitting Joesph in the head.
Why does Jack continue to get weeks for incidents that the AFL's love children get off? ******* PISSES ME OFF BIG TIME!!!!
The club needs to make a stand next time one of our players cops a bullshit suspension and make it well known that certain players are being treated differently to others. The AFL needs to be held accountable for the inconsistent and deceitful MRP.
The MRP stated that Fyfe had his hands out to try and win the ball, do they think we are morons? His hands were never moving toward the ball at all. His sole intention was to clear space then win the ball. He got it slightly wrong and I don't have an issue with it.
But why suspend Ziebell when he got his spoil slightly wrong?
Rant over!!!!