75 radical ideas to transform Australia. Be like Gough.... but in reverse.

Remove this Banner Ad

Dan26

Brownlow Medallist
Jan 23, 2000
25,043
20,051
Werribee
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
post count: 38,986
This is a great article about the destructive impact, Gough Whitlam had in only a short period of time, such was his frantic activity, and desire to socialize Australia. What "should" a Coalition government do? I agree with nearly every of the below proposals, and so should any freedom loving person, who knows that smaller government, less government departments, and less regulations means more wealth, a higher standard of living and a more prosperous country.

I'd do it. I wouldn't care if I lost government in three years. I'd have transformed Australia for the good.

http://ipa.org.au/publications/2080/be-like-gough-75-radical-ideas-to-transform-Australia

If he wins government, Abbott faces a clear choice. He could simply overturn one or two symbolic Gillard-era policies like the carbon tax, and govern moderately. He would not offend any interest groups. In doing so, he'd probably secure a couple of terms in office for himself and the Liberal Party. But would this be a successful government? We don't believe so. The remorseless drift to bigger government and less freedom would not halt, and it would resume with vigour when the Coalition eventually loses office. We hope he grasps the opportunity to fundamentally reshape the political culture and stem the assault on individual liberty.

1 Repeal the carbon tax, and don't replace it. It will be one thing to remove the burden of the carbon tax from the Australian economy. But if it is just replaced by another costly scheme, most of the benefits will be undone.
2 Abolish the Department of Climate Change
3 Abolish the Clean Energy Fund
4 Repeal Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act
5 Abandon Australia's bid for a seat on the United Nations Security Council
6 Repeal the renewable energy target
7 Return income taxing powers to the states
8 Abolish the Commonwealth Grants Commission
9 Abolish the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
10 Withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol
11 Introduce fee competition to Australian universities
12 Repeal the National Curriculum
13 Introduce competing private secondary school curriculums
14 Abolish the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)
15 Eliminate laws that require radio and television broadcasters to be 'balanced'
16 Abolish television spectrum licensing and devolve spectrum management to the common law
17 End local content requirements for Australian television stations
18 Eliminate family tax benefits
19 Abandon the paid parental leave scheme
20 Means-test Medicare
21 End all corporate welfare and subsidies by closing the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education
22 Introduce voluntary voting
23 End mandatory disclosures on political donations
24 End media blackout in final days of election campaigns
25 End public funding to political parties
26 Remove anti-dumping laws
27 Eliminate media ownership restrictions
28 Abolish the Foreign Investment Review Board
29 Eliminate the National Preventative Health Agency
30 Cease subsidising the car industry
31 Formalise a one-in, one-out approach to regulatory reduction
32 Rule out federal funding for 2018 Commonwealth Games
33 Deregulate the parallel importation of books
34 End preferences for Industry Super Funds in workplace relations laws
35 Legislate a cap on government spending and tax as a percentage of GDP
36 Legislate a balanced budget amendment which strictly limits the size of budget deficits and the period the federal government can be in deficit
37 Force government agencies to put all of their spending online in a searchable database
38 Repeal plain packaging for cigarettes and rule it out for all other products, including alcohol and fast food
39 Reintroduce voluntary student unionism at universities
40 Introduce a voucher scheme for secondary schools
41 Repeal the alcopops tax
42 Introduce a special economic zone in the north of Australia including:
a) Lower personal income tax for residents
b) Significantly expanded 457 Visa programs for workers
c) Encourage the construction of dams
43 Repeal the mining tax
44 Devolve environmental approvals for major projects to the states
45 Introduce a single rate of income tax with a generous tax-free threshold
46 Cut company tax to an internationally competitive rate of 25 per cent
47 Cease funding the Australia Network
48 Privatise Australia Post
49 Privatise Medibank
50 Break up the ABC and put out to tender each individual function
51 Privatise SBS
52 Reduce the size of the public service from current levels of more than 260,000 to at least the 2001 low of 212,784
53 Repeal the Fair Work Act
54 Allow individuals and employers to negotiate directly terms of employment that suit them
55 Encourage independent contracting by overturning new regulations designed to punish contractors
56 Abolish the Baby Bonus
57 Abolish the First Home Owners' Grant
58 Allow the Northern Territory to become a state
59 Halve the size of the Coalition front bench from 32 to 16
60 Remove all remaining tariff and non-tariff barriers to international trade
61 Slash top public servant salaries to much lower international standards, like in the United States
62 End all public subsidies to sport and the arts
63 Privatise the Australian Institute of Sport
64 End all hidden protectionist measures, such as preferences for local manufacturers in government tendering
65 Abolish the Office for Film and Literature Classification
66 Rule out any government-supported or mandated internet censorship
67 Means test tertiary student loans
68 Allow people to opt out of superannuation in exchange for promising to forgo any government income support in retirement
69 Immediately halt construction of the National Broadband Network and privatise any sections that have already been built
70 End all government funded Nanny State advertising
71 Reject proposals for compulsory food and alcohol labelling
72 Privatise the CSIRO
73 Defund Harmony Day
74 Close the Office for Youth
75 Privatise the Snowy-Hydro Scheme
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Obviously there are a lot of biased pigs, with their snouts in the trough, who would be deeply offended but is that a bad thing?

I don't agree with all of the suggestions but its got the right idea
 
Obviously there are a lot of biased pigs, with their snouts in the trough, who would be deeply offended but is that a bad thing?

I don't agree with all of the suggestions but its got the right idea

Any combination of say 4-8 of those items selected at random would be enough to lose the coalition the next election. Trying to do all 75 at once would reduce their primary vote to single figures.
 
Its basically a big "if you are not a millionaire you can **** off and die" policy.

Oink

No, its a little closer to the biblical aphorism: the lord helps those who help themselves.

If we all focused on helping those in genuine need, and assisting those striving forward then the world would be a better place.

Any combination of say 4-8 of those items selected at random would be enough to lose the coalition the next election. Trying to do all 75 at once would reduce their primary vote to single figures.

That's your theory, but if everyone thought the same there would be no need for parliament or elections.

Too many people want to vote themselves other people's money. Oink oink
 
Cut corporate tax rate to 25%, end reporting of political donations and Legislate a cap on government spending and tax as a percentage of GDP.

Gee, sounds very Tea Party to me, not very groupthink at all.
 
Means testing Medicare and a northern tax-free zone seem especially insane. Who are these people?
 
Cut corporate tax rate to 25%, end reporting of political donations and Legislate a cap on government spending and tax as a percentage of GDP.

Gee, sounds very Tea Party to me, not very groupthink at all.

Sounds very sensible to me. Though i'd not end transparency on donations

Means testing Medicare and a northern tax-free zone seem especially insane. Who are these people?

What would be wrong with a means test?

What's wrong with limiting state assistance to those in need?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Do that and Australia may as well close down as a country as clearly we have failed and deserve whatever terrible fate we end up getting.

You're not serious are you?

Nearly every policy either reduces wasteful spending, reduces irrelevant and meaningless spending, and reduces the size of government, and reduces regulations.

From streamlining income tax, to getting rid of any remaining tariffs, to eliminating laws the make it harder for businesses to "do business", this would be a transformation that would probably make Australia the wealthiest per capita nation on the planet.

I especially like getting rid of the department of education, and introducing competing curriculums.

Competition is the lifeblood of creating wealth. That is a stone cold fact.

I love getting rid of these useless government departments, that do nothing, achieve nothing, and cost plenty. The office of film and literature classification? Puh-lease, lol. Oh how will we get by? Our young will watch a movie without knowing it is R rated. Oh No! The office for youth? Haha, yeah good one.

Cease subsidising the car industry. YES. A million times yes.
 
That's your theory, but if everyone thought the same there would be no need for parliament or elections.

Too many people want to vote themselves other people's money. Oink oink

Too many fatsos think they earn the money they stuff into their fat gobs, rather than the people who work for them. Oink Oink
 
That's your theory, but if everyone thought the same there would be no need for parliament or elections.

Too many people want to vote themselves other people's money. Oink oink

Nah go on - pick a few at random. Go through and think about who would be opposed to each one. The list is a pre-laid plan about how to piss off each interested voting bloc one by one till you have nobody left but Dan26 and his fellow 5 percenters.
 
What would be wrong with a means test?

What's wrong with limiting state assistance to those in need?
I think universal health care should be ... universal. Australia's system seems one of the more reasonably balanced between private and public health. Driving the health system towards proven failed models like the United States would be a massive folly. Thankfully Abbott is far saner than these pencil necks.

For what benefit are they driving this agenda? Purely ideological. It is weird leftist elites are criticised when the CVs of the writers show no actual work experience outside academia.
 
Nah go on - pick a few at random. Go through and think about who would be opposed to each one. The list is a pre-laid plan about how to piss off each interested voting bloc one by one till you have nobody left but Dan26 and his fellow 5 percenters.

No one ever said that doing the right thing, and the best thing would be popular.

The world owes a lot to unpopular people, and their courage.
 
No one ever said that doing the right thing, and the best thing would be popular.

The world owes a lot to unpopular people, and their courage.

Being stupid, unpopular and devoted to doing wrong is even more pointless.

This is about opening the country up to any foreign investor that wants to come in strip out what they can, and hoping they leave a few scraps behind for everyone else to scramble for. The small international capital mobile class, not the ordinary Australian. My attitude is that we own the place and they will come in on our terms that are mutally beneficial.

To give you a really crude analogy (mods can delete this section if it offends) it's like a geek at high school who wants to be mates with the bogan crowd at his school. So he drugs his sister and ties her to the bed, buys beer and then invites them over for a party, hoping they will all be his mates afterwards.
 
63 Privatise the Australian Institute of Sport

ROFL!

71 Reject proposals for compulsory food and alcohol labelling

Does this have peanuts? Oh well, I suppose I have my Epi-pen handy... here goes...
 
I think universal health care should be ... universal. Australia's system seems one of the more reasonably balanced between private and public health. Driving the health system towards proven failed models like the United States would be a massive folly. Thankfully Abbott is far saner than these pencil necks.

For what benefit are they driving this agenda? Purely ideological. It is weird leftist elites are criticised when the CVs of the writers show no actual work experience outside academia.

The reason why socializing medicine has failed in so many countries, including Australia, is because it ends up costing more money. The problem in the USA is that they've done something actually WORSE. By subsidizing the
insurance industry to the extent that they do and by making it healthcare part of employment they've actually caused health care prices to go up even faster with their form of socialism than other parts of the other countries have with theirs. people don't shop around. They just get what they employer gives them.

Take areas of related to health where the government is not involved at all. Laser eye surgery, Cosmetic surgery. Look at the competition and the cost reduction in those areas, where the government is NOT involved.

Healthcare is a commodity, not a right. It costs money. There are freedoms like freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, but as soon as you start making commodities into rights, where do you stop?

Food? You can last longer without food, than you can without health. Why not make that a "right." Why not make housing a "right" all paid for by our taxes. After all, shelter is more important than healthcare.

It means everyone involved in healthcare effectively becomes your slave... after all, it's your "right"

Socialized health is a dismal failure. When it is half socialized, like in the USA it's even worse. The best result would be to open it up totally to the market. The cost savings "like with laser eye surgery) and resulting competition would be immense.
 
The reason why socializing medicine has failed in so many countries, including Australia, is because it ends up costing more money.
In what way has it failed in this Australia?

Australia is the second longest living country in the world. Only Japan lives longer.

By the most important benchmark - life expectancy - our health system has not failed. Why throw this away in appeal to the purity of some empty ideology?
 
The reason why socializing medicine has failed in so many countries, including Australia, is because it ends up costing more money. The problem in the USA is that they've done something actually WORSE. By subsidizing the
insurance industry to the extent that they do and by making it healthcare part of employment they've actually caused health care prices to go up even faster with their form of socialism than other parts of the other countries have with theirs. people don't shop around. They just get what they employer gives them.

Take areas of related to health where the government is not involved at all. Laser eye surgery, Cosmetic surgery. Look at the competition and the cost reduction in those areas, where the government is NOT involved.

Healthcare is a commodity, not a right. It costs money. There are freedoms like freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, but as soon as you start making commodities into rights, where do you stop?

What a consignment of the brown smelly from the rear end of a bull.

Demand for health services is not discretionary, therefore it is not a commodity. What couple has ever sat down and decided that because little Jimmy is starting high school this year - it's best to defer that car-crash and that diagnosis of breast cancer to a more convenient time?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top