Who's Shill? And to be honest I do think there are questions about WT7, and my dad wasn't even an engineer!
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Conspiracy Theory 9/11 - Part 2
- Thread starter exe ex machina
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Who's Shill? And to be honest I do think there are questions about WT7, and my dad wasn't even an engineer!
Thrawn
Premium Platinum
I believe that it was Danny Jowenko who said that WTC7 was definitely a demo job.
The vast vast majority have no issues about it? Have you asked them? There'd be quite a few who would most certainly think something was amiss. Jowenko certainly did. And if he has issues with it, then it'd be more than "one or two" who would.
Thread seems to be gaining momentum again
nothing like claiming victory in an empty room only for the bell to ring and everybody returns to class.
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Thrawn
Premium Platinum
Rioliustar, what is your take on other conspiracy theories, such as JFK? Any that you think that something just might be there?
exe ex machina
Kylo was here
- Thread starter
- #4,331
Ask him about Global Warming
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
- Banned
- #4,332
Is that you GG ?Ask him about Global Warming
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
- Banned
- #4,333
I haven't really looked into JFK too much, just the odd doco here and there.
Once I finally convince you there was plane wreckage at the Pentagon, I'll have a read of what you suggest
- Banned
- #4,335
I don't know which is more condemning RIOLIUSTAR
NIST finally admitting and certifying free fall occurred for 2.25 seconds or their backflip
dry-labbing indeed
NIST finally admitting and certifying free fall occurred for 2.25 seconds or their backflip
dry-labbing indeed
evo
Let's hit the f*ken road!
dry labia
exe ex machina
Kylo was here
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
- Banned
- #4,338
Lol it's been common knowledge for yearsI don't know which is more condemning RIOLIUSTAR
NIST finally admitting and certifying free fall occurred for 2.25 seconds or their backflip
Though I'm still waiting for nutters.com to admit it was only for 2.25 seconds
"pull it"
- Banned
- #4,339
You idiot...your name sunder or gross?
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
- Banned
- #4,340
evo
Let's hit the f*ken road!
wasn't bad, but nothing really new. Good to at least watch one without all the sensationalism.
It was filmed 4 years ago so I guess they never got the reopening of the investigation they expected.
- Mar 16, 2002
- 24,893
- 16,594
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond
Lol it's been common knowledge for years
Though I'm still waiting for nutters.com to admit it was only for 2.25 seconds
"pull it"
So there was no resistance in the collapse for 2.25 seconds??? How did fire remove its structural make up for this to happen?
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Thrawn
Premium Platinum
You mean the report where they refuse the share the input data to their computer simulations? That report?There's a report, go check
- Mar 16, 2002
- 24,893
- 16,594
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond
There's a report, go check
Scraping the bottom of the barrel now.
Last edited:
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
- Banned
- #4,347
Yes that's the one.
I guess due to legal advice they decided not to release all the info to the public for fear of jeopardising safety.
Shall we add the lawyers to the "inonit list"?
They released some photos of plane debris at the Pentagon though, did you see that?
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
- Banned
- #4,348
hmmm conspiracy club lol
Thrawn
Premium Platinum
Ha, jeopardising public safety. It's a bullshit answer and you know it.
The input data would be extremely invaluable for engineers to fix or design buildings that have these vulnerabilities. It would also allow a third party to actually verify that their data is accurate. You can't do a proper peer review if you don't have all the data that was used.
It's many degrees of shady, but of course, you'll swallow it hook, line and sinker.
- Status
