- Mar 1, 2014
- 13,945
- 17,611
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Cronulla Sutherland Sharks
Did I hear it right? The AFL will use a fourth field umpire in the NAB Cup? How many frees do these clowns want to deliver in a game?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
inb4 general afl talk thread
Didn't they reduce the number of team runners to keep the number of non players on the field down
The game is much faster these days.They probably need 4 to keep up but I still think they only have 2 boundary umpires?
They went to three a few years ago, and now are at four. Each boundary takes one quarter of the ground.The game is much faster these days.They probably need 4 to keep up but I still think they only have 2 boundary umpires?
It's only for NAB, doubtful we would see it in season proper for a year or two at least
If you think there is a problem with umpiring in general, then just see it as an attempt to rectify. At least they are trying something.It's still a problem that they're even thinking about it, NAB Cup or not.
If you think there is a problem with umpiring in general, then just see it as an attempt to rectify. At least they are trying something.
Personally I think the umpiring is excellent overall.
But if they aren't or aren't able (as you seem to believe) then an attempt to rectify this is surely a good thing.They do not need an extra umpire they need the three they have to get into the right position. Three umps keep up with the play OK but they are often not in position to see what is happening. This is a point made by Kennedy. We already have too many stoppages and an extra ump is only going to add to the stop start aspect of the game and open the door for more confusion.
Can't they just strap an umpire to spidercam and fly him around the ground instead?
It is isn't me, that is what the AFL Umpires Coach Hayden Kennedy had to say on NINE News last night. He wasn't on about the game being too fast for three umps, he was on about the umpires not being in position to catch infractions. What concerns me is the AFL introduces 'ticky touchwood' rules then want more umpires to police them. I would settle for the blatant frees to be picked up and the 50/50 ones to be let go so the game flows and I do not think the extra umpire will help achieve that. In fact I think the reverse will happen but I guess we will have to wait and see what happens in the NAB Cup.But if they aren't or aren't able (as you seem to believe) then an attempt to rectify this is surely a good thing.
....
How does that work, anyway? Umpire A makes one decision and umpire B comes in and says something else. How long until we see umpires arguing on the field to have their decision stand?
....
If you think there is a problem with umpiring in general, then just see it as an attempt to rectify. At least they are trying something.
Personally I think the umpiring is excellent overall.
I believe the AFL wants a 4th different interpretation of each contentious decision.Did I hear it right? The AFL will use a fourth field umpire in the NAB Cup? How many frees do these clowns want to deliver in a game?