I hardly sighted Pendlebury. What game were they watching?Brownlow votes:
3. - Sam Jacobs (Adelaide)
2. - Rory Sloane (Adelaide)
1. - Scott Pendlebury (Collingwood)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I hardly sighted Pendlebury. What game were they watching?Brownlow votes:
3. - Sam Jacobs (Adelaide)
2. - Rory Sloane (Adelaide)
1. - Scott Pendlebury (Collingwood)
He actually looked like he convulsed a couple of times when they were still trying to get the mouthguard out.I understand but he was down a long time, barely moving. You can't blame anyone for thinking the worse the way he looked.
I thought they were trying to stop him from swallowing his tongue but then i realized they were getting the mouthguard out.He actually looked like he convulsed a couple of times when they were still trying to get the mouthguard out.
Smith was better than Sloane imo. Brodie should have got the 2 votes. Either way Pendlebury shouldn't be in there. Can't disagree with Sauce with the 3 votes, he was immense and destroyed Grundy.Brownlow votes:
3. - Sam Jacobs (Adelaide)
2. - Rory Sloane (Adelaide)
1. - Scott Pendlebury (Collingwood)
How do I subscribe?We have Collingwood as an 88% chance to cover the +19.5 line and 70% chance to win
I hardly sighted Pendlebury. What game were they watching?
Sorry, I was too busy watching the win.The one where Pendlebury had 32 disposals (78% efficiency), 5 inside 50s, 4 rebound 50s and 3 clearances. You know, his usual quality fare.
Brownlow votes:
3. - Sam Jacobs (Adelaide)
2. - Rory Sloane (Adelaide)
1. - Scott Pendlebury (Collingwood)
So Danger with 30 disposals and 2 goals wasnt as good as Pendlebury?
51.7% disposal efficiency says no.
No, you being a Collingwood supporter says no.
Has absolutely nothing to do with it.
No. Of course not.
And Tippett and DavisImagine if the crows still had gunston
And Tippett and Davis
Biased? What was the free kick count?Collingwood would've lost this by 100 pts if - Adelaide didn't stop in 4th qtr, Adelaide didn't kick at goal so poorly and the umpires weren't terribly biased towards gifting Collingwood goals in the first half.
Sick of people using that as the measurement of even umpiring. One team may tackle a lot better than the other. One team may get shots at goal from frees where as the other gets them in defence with a 2 on 1 etcBiased? What was the free kick count?
Mate the fact is that pies have been down the ladder of the free kick count since Jesus wore knickerbockers. If you're going to knock a team about easy freekicks have a look at your own record in WA, then the Pies anywhereSick of people using that as the measurement of even umpiring. One team may tackle a lot better than the other. One team may get shots at goal from frees where as the other gets them in defence with a 2 on 1 etc