Roast AFL salary cap investigation into Port's new structure + Triggonometry

Remove this Banner Ad

Dobie G

Club Legend
Aug 25, 2013
1,339
878
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
AFL rules prevent any AFL club having direct coaching on footballers 18 or younger.

Source

PORT Adelaide say they have nothing to fear despite the AFL's salary cap investigator flagging concerns about the club's revamped structure.
The concerns of AFL investigator Ken Wood were disclosed in an email mistakenly released to media by Port's football operations manager Peter Rohde on Wednesday.
From next season, Port will effectively field a reserves side in South Australia's second-tier competition, the SANFL.
But Wood expressed concern after being alerted by an un-named club, suspected to be Port's bitter home-town rivals Adelaide, to aspects of the Power's reserves deal.
Port will create several youth academies in a revised structure from next season. But AFL rules prohibit any AFL club having a direct coaching influence on footballers aged 18 or under.
Port chief executive Keith Thomas said his club "clearly understood'' that rule.
"They (the AFL) don't want an AFL club having access to under-age players and hiding them inside the system, and that is not our intention at all,'' Thomas told reporters on Wednesday.
Thomas will meet Wood next week to allay any concern.
"It is all above board ... we have no issues at all - I guarantee you,'' Thomas said.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...erves-sanfl-deal/story-fnia6ojc-1226717081657
More
 
...we arent coaching anyone below 18? Thats part of the agreement? Herpaderpafallopiantubes

EDIT: It must be in relation to next year and keeping our juniors. Twiggy is mad and wants to take it out on some kids.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Triggy Having a sook.

265686-steven-trigg.jpg
 
a few clubs already have u18 academy's weird rule...psst don't tell the crows but we can start hiding underage centre half forwards now...
 
So the SANFL comes back to us with a revised deal, we hold an information evening for our members to present the case, the board considers the CEOs recommendation and accepts the deal and then, in less than 24hrs, "a rival club" expresses concerns to the AFL.

1. It couldn't possibly be any club other than Adelaide.
2. How do they know the fine details of the proposal? Where have they got this information from so quickly?
3. Where is the SANFL in this? They've approved the deal and even allowed some last minute revisions to get it over the line, why have they not made a statement?

Tin foil hat time: this is sounding like a setup.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So the SANFL comes back to us with a revised deal, we hold an information evening for our members to present the case, the board considers the CEOs recommendation and accepts the deal and then, in less than 24hrs, "a rival club" expresses concerns to the AFL.

1. It couldn't possibly be any club other than Adelaide.
2. How do they know the fine details of the proposal? Where have they got this information from so quickly?
3. Where is the SANFL in this? They've approved the deal and even allowed some last minute revisions to get it over the line, why have they not made a statement?

Tin foil hat time: this is sounding like a setup.


What good would a setup do anyway? We haven't actually done anything yet. We've made no attempt to be anything other than open throughout the whole process. The worst that could happen is the agreement is torn up.

My guess is that the AFL will just want clarity on how we manage the youth academies. We obviously can't send Hinkley to coach 14 year olds.
 
Sorry to burst your Crows bashing bubble, but channel 9 reported it was an interstate club that complained
 
Sorry to burst your Crows bashing bubble, but channel 9 reported it was an interstate club that complained

Don't care. Blaming the crows.
 
Look I'm no fan of Triggy but he's not responsible for every **** up

Maybe we should lay off Triggy else he could get sacked, and we wouldn't want that. :D
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top