Interesting the players association have decided to brand their own top 50 as chosen by the players.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/features/players-top-50
Not a terrible list so far but a few anomalies that really stand out . . .
Given the list is supposed to reflect the best players 'right now' player 28 stands out as the most obvious who really isn't a top 50 player anymore. AS great as Bartel has been not sure he belongs in their either. And number 14 needs an asterix at minimum even though he is way higher than he should be based on recent form...
Interestingly the list is overwhelmingly midfielders just like the brownlow. IS that a reflection of the game or selection bias?
Ahead of the 2015 season we presented the AFL players with a simple challenge: rank the best in the game, right now
http://www.afl.com.au/news/features/players-top-50
Not a terrible list so far but a few anomalies that really stand out . . .
Given the list is supposed to reflect the best players 'right now' player 28 stands out as the most obvious who really isn't a top 50 player anymore. AS great as Bartel has been not sure he belongs in their either. And number 14 needs an asterix at minimum even though he is way higher than he should be based on recent form...
Interestingly the list is overwhelmingly midfielders just like the brownlow. IS that a reflection of the game or selection bias?