Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
What's the name of this thread again?
There is such thing as those who become unmanageable.You know, I think there's an element of truth to what you're saying. H probably does get too heated. But that's something a good man-manager would be able to work with, and it seems Buckley has failed there. At least H gets heated over upholding standards and being inclusive: don't be racist, don't be homophobic, etc. He's not at all like Robinson or Garlett, etc, who are on the outer because they wouldn't uphold standards. H is professional. He will be a loss to the club. He gives us experience and dash. We're kidding ourselves if we think we'll be better when he's gone.
You know, I think there's an element of truth to what you're saying. H probably does get too heated. But that's something a good man-manager would be able to work with, and it seems Buckley has failed there. At least H gets heated over upholding standards and being inclusive: don't be racist, don't be homophobic, etc. He's not at all like Robinson or Garlett, etc, who are on the outer because they wouldn't uphold standards. H is professional. He will be a loss to the club. He gives us experience and dash. We're kidding ourselves if we think we'll be better when he's gone.
I actually like H both as a player and what he stands for. I am not arguing for us to move him on. However I do not agree with people blaming Buckley's man management style for how H responds to things. 'You can lead a horse to water' as they say...but at some stage in a football environment you weigh up the individual against the team needs - especially if you already have tried to help the individual.
Leigh Mathews is a 4 time premiership coach and he had difficulty handling Aker - very publicly as well. Not matter how good a man manager you are there will always be individuals where after trying, and things not changing the club needs to cut their losses. At some stage the conversation becomes 'we feel we have done everything we can to support you and address the issues you believe in but you remain unhappy and it is starting to affect the team'.
I'd prefer that H stays, he provides us things we don't have on field, but IMHO it isn't Buckley's fault if the decision is made for him to be elsewhere.
We will have to disagree on the Buckley issue regards H Finnishpie, as i cant say much more regards the issue without being uncomfortable doing so.You know, I agree with that - in terms of the reasoning. I guess we're not going to know exactly what's going on behing closed doors - in fact, we're really having a discussion without all the details (apart from H's criticism of Eddie last year, which I thought was fair enough, and the 'poster' which also seems okay to me). But the Lane article suggests that the club has the problem, as did Roos on AFL 360. So that suggests H is nothing like Aker, who lets face it, is an idiot. I just can't imagine H having done anything so bad that it's irreconcilable. So he speaks up, gets emotional - doesn't sound so bad to me. And we need him badly at the moment. So I've got some pretty big questions. And from the outside it seems like the problem is with Buckley and/or the club.
There is such thing as those who become unmanageable.
I used an analogy in another thread.
It's a typical case of the students trying out the new teacher. This one student was pretty much silenced by the old one and has taken the opportunity to let loose when the new teacher arrives. The class clown uses new opportunities to voice an opinion but uses it to disrupt.
People to be responsible for their own actions. If the stories of unrest are true, the players should be ashamed of themselves for behaving like school kids acting out because their beloved old teacher is gone.
To think that we laughed at Kouta and his mates for sooking about Pagan.
We will have to disagree on the Buckley issue regards H Finnishpie, as i cant say much more regards the issue without being uncomfortable doing so.
Thanks for the suggestion but Have listened and cast my mind to my own colleagues who display the same attributes but are still a thorn in the Boss' side.I suggest you listen to our former captain on H: he's genuine, he's not sensitive, he's professional, he's one of the fittest, etc. Doesn't sound unmanageable to me.
http://www.sen.com.au/display-article-2013/Nick-Maxwell-on-Lumumba/71406
I suggest you also listen to his manager who says that H focusses on the 20% that' wrong not the 80% that's right all the time and his team mates are getting jack of it because frankly he is just coming across as a negative person far too often.I suggest you listen to our former captain on H: he's genuine, he's not sensitive, he's professional, he's one of the fittest, etc. Doesn't sound unmanageable to me.
http://www.sen.com.au/display-article-2013/Nick-Maxwell-on-Lumumba/71406
You just beat me to it with your superior cutting and pasting skills!http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/he...ark-eyes-magpies/story-fndv8g1a-1227060688975
It's academic & elementary now, it would seem.
http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/he...ark-eyes-magpies/story-fndv8g1a-1227060688975
It's academic & elementary now, it would seem.
http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/he...ark-eyes-magpies/story-fndv8g1a-1227060688975
It's academic & elementary now, it would seem.
geez, mid-to late 20s pick, i'd almost take that instead of clarke at this stage.
Well it may end up that we get a second rounder for Harry while giving up a third rounder for Clark by the sounds of that article. If that happens I'd see it as a massive win.geez, mid-to late 20s pick, i'd almost take that instead of clarke at this stage.
Well it may end up that we get a second rounder for Harry while giving up a third rounder for Clark by the sounds of that article. If that happens I'd see it as a massive win.