No Oppo Supporters CAS hands down guilty verdict - Players appealing - Dank shot - no opposition - (cont in pt.2)
- Thread starter Doss
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Fair enough, in your opinion does your source get accurate info?
- Apr 27, 2013
- 3,555
- 4,422
- AFL Club
- Essendon
No I didn't say that. I said that if there were other banned substances on site apart from Tb4 and Hex, the AFL or ASADA would have leaked it to communication specialists by now. It's been like 2-3 weeks (or even before Xmas) since ASADA supposedly tendered this "evidence" and no one from the media has said anything about it. If there was a paper trail connecting Tb4 to EFC and other banned drugs, you can almost bank on it that they would have leaked it to Fairfax or Roy Masters by now.
The weird thing was Luke Darcy asked him do you trust Dank? His answer "uncertain but I trusted him enough to inject my pregnant wife in the stomach". Now I was flabbergasted by those comments and this aired on ch7.
That testimony everyone is now referring to is more than likely the testimony of Dean Robinson and not a player. There is no mention of a player. How would a player even know what products the club received or be involved in the acceptance of such products. Doesn't make sense. The high performance manager would be in that position however and Robinson did admit to self injecting various products.
A lot of Robinsons testimony is also disputed by all of Thompson, Hird, Corcoran, Hamilton and Reid.
A lot of Robinsons testimony is also disputed by all of Thompson, Hird, Corcoran, Hamilton and Reid.
Doss
Ass
- Aug 1, 2011
- 75,214
- 112,305
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Thread starter
- #44,086
At the end of the day, there's actually no way of knowing whether it was based in reality or not.
Probably best to disregard it until it is confirmed otherwise. If indeed that happens.
If people on BF posted every supposed inside source they had as definite fact, well, the site would explode.
Maintain healthy cynicism and assume nothing. Not much we can do as fans at this point.
Probably best to disregard it until it is confirmed otherwise. If indeed that happens.
If people on BF posted every supposed inside source they had as definite fact, well, the site would explode.
Maintain healthy cynicism and assume nothing. Not much we can do as fans at this point.
- Apr 27, 2013
- 3,555
- 4,422
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Chip wrote two articles: one about ASADA accusing us of taking both hexarelin and tb4 and accusing Dank of supplying something to Carlton (The Australian, December 17, 2014) , and one where players texted each other about "thymo" injections (Australian, December 16, 2014).
In both articles, Chip mentions the arguments that are outlined are from ASADA's case submissions
What you sayin' Henny Penny? Time ta pull out da hard hat agin I s'pose...
- Apr 27, 2013
- 3,555
- 4,422
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Probably because most of ASADA's evidence has already been leaked by Fairfax over the course of the past two years
BomberFan355
Premiership Player
Veteran
Essendon Player Sponsor 2019 - Orazio Fantasia, Anthony McDonald Tipungwuti, Shaun McKernan
Essendon Player Sponsor 2018 - Colyer, Fantasia, McDonald-Tipungwuti and McKernan
Essendon Player Sponsor 2017
Essendon Player Sponsor 2016
Essendon Player Sponsor 2014
Essendon Player Sponsor 2013
Essendon Player Sponsor 2015
- Jun 6, 2012
- 3,259
- 4,446
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Nascar, Cricket
Why have them all and only give the players TB4? Why not HGH, atleast it might actually do something.
Could you also pm me as well?
Its only hexaralin and melanotan (maybe) - what others?
yaco55
Hall of Famer
This was my initial thought. Hard to believe an individual player could name 6 banned substances on site.
yaco55
Hall of Famer
I can see why there is chatter about Sheedy returning - He could end up as President if things go pear shaped.
Which brings me to my next question - Discussion about the Board changing - The two newly elected board members ran strongly on a Pro-Hird ticket - They will face an interesting dilemma.
It's apt that the poster ( a well reasoned poster ) with the potentially startling revelations has a user name from a club that i strongly suspect was backgrounding the AFL.
Which brings me to my next question - Discussion about the Board changing - The two newly elected board members ran strongly on a Pro-Hird ticket - They will face an interesting dilemma.
It's apt that the poster ( a well reasoned poster ) with the potentially startling revelations has a user name from a club that i strongly suspect was backgrounding the AFL.
My only thought are, could it be ASADA implying Tb4, not directly the player saying it was?
Along the line of what Francis has said vague answers being listed by ASADA as 'Yes'
Along the line of what Francis has said vague answers being listed by ASADA as 'Yes'
According to the original source the document was based partly on a player or ex player's signed affidavit.
Players have only been charged with TB4, probably because they have the most evidence around the its use, but this doesnt mean they arent suspected of taking other banned substances also.
- Status
Similar threads
