ppoiter
Premiership Player
- Feb 28, 2013
- 3,246
- 3,847
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
What a bunch of hypocrites they are, whinging on there board that they better get a top 10 pick if aish leaves. If I remember correctly on our board during the beams trade they were saying that when a player nominates a club you never get fair compensation. So if aish nominates one club a 4th rounder should do it lol.
They arent quite in full meltdown mode yet but getting there. Here are some good bits from the last couple of pages of their Aish thread. Wouldnt usually find this funny but in light of their smugness during the Beams trade it makes pretty fun reading
After some thought, maybe we need to make an example out of him. I do want something good for him but we can't let these players go home straight away. If he wants a trade anywhere, then that is fine, we can get a good trade out of it through a Victorian club or something.
If he nominates a club specifially, l think he needs to go to PSD. It would suck short term but long term hopefully it works out by stopping kids who think they can stay at ours for 2 years then go back to mommy.
Seriously sick of this s**t. Send him to the PSD, we need to make a statement, enough is enough, screw him.
Forgive me if this is a silly question, but if we were to lose Aish, where would that place the club in terms of requesting a priority pick?
As I understand, there is no specific criteria, it is just at the afl's discretion.
Surely our potential situation of losing our top end talent equates to melbourne just being consistently ordinary, they didn't lose their talent, just failed to develop them
Conspiracy theory time: We drafted Aish purposely to demonstrate the power of the go-home factor. Expect a retention allowance in some form in 2016.