eth-dog
Tier 1 WW Player
Carlisle's an average ruckman. His positioning and nous at the stoppages is plain average. He's an oversized KPP instead of a ruckman
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Watching Griffiths tonight I'm not concerned about Black getting silver in this. Carlisle is very far ahead of them both, looks better as a defender though.
Hardly conditions for Griffiths tbh. His contested marking in the last few weeks has been sensational and is something I haven't seen Black do. His probably going to take the longest to develop imo.
One of the best things about Aaron Black is that he's just as good in any conditions. Actually said after the game he likes to play in the wet, was brilliant at ground level. Black's marking has looked improved this year, it's coming on but very very slowly. I think Griffiths will come good too though.Hardly conditions for Griffiths tbh. His contested marking in the last few weeks has been sensational and is something I haven't seen Black do. His probably going to take the longest to develop imo.
It what way?I think Black has a bit of Lance Whitnall about him personally
Just in that he's more than competent at ground level, not really suited to the #1 forwards role and has a bit of pace. My memory is hazy about Whitnall though, I may be wrong about himIt what way?
Sent from my GT-I9305T using Tapatalk
A few years on and Carlisle is the clear leader here surely. Unlike the other two he has shown he can play back and forward at a high level, and put up a decent fight in ruck. All good players, but for me it's clearly
Carlisle
Black
Griffiths
Agreed, at this stage I would rather have Black in the forward line than Carlisle. He's an excellent shot on goal and for a big bloke he's excellent off the ground as he showed on the weekend...although he probably got some help from the Sydney defence, or lack thereof.Carlisle has shown he can play back very well, forward is still up for consideration. He does have a great pair of hands that allow him to really be a good forward.
That said, l would agree with your list at this stage, the end of the year will give a good indication of where players sit.
A few years on and Carlisle is the clear leader here surely. Unlike the other two he has shown he can play back and forward at a high level, and put up a decent fight in ruck. All good players, but for me it's clearly
Carlisle
Black
Griffiths
41 goals in 19 games (2 played permanently forward, only 3 of Waite's goals were on while Carlisle was on him, missed first GWS game)Yet to play fwd at a high level. Yet to play fwd much at all.
Anyone got numbers on Carlisle's goals conceded last year?
41 goals in 19 games (2 played permanently forward, only 3 of Waite's goals were on while Carlisle was on him, missed first GWS game)
Quite a few of his goals conceded were in time on of the last qtr, when the game was over. Cloke kicked 3 in that time, Taylor Walker 2, but when the game was on he usually fired.So probably slightly below average in terms of actually restricting goals?
Did a lot of eye catching things but I'm not convinced he had a great year.
Carlisle's Champion Data writeup isn't overly kind:
"Carlisle was Essendon's swingman last season, often switching ends with Michael Hurley. As a defender he struggled against elite key forwards, conceding three or more goals seven times which included eight to Lance Franklin and five to Travis Cloke in consecutive weeks. He defended the most one-on-one contests at the club and ranked No.1 for spoils, second for intercept marks and fourth for intercept possessions. He was a low risk player with ball in hand, with 22% of his kicks directed either backwards or laterally. As a result he recorded the highest retention rate by foot of the 140 players in the AFL across the H&A season who recorded at least 200 kicks. As a forward he was a poor target, recording the second-worst rate of the top 120 targets in the competition."
Carlisle didn't have a great year as he was inconsistent across 22 games but the first half of his year was AA quality. He was patchy in the second half of the year but he still managed to soundly beat Kennedy twice.
His season is also far and above anything Black or Griffith's have produced.
No it's not, mate. For all the flashy things he did, he had a below average year for a key defender. It wasn't a patchy second half of the year, it was a very poor second half of the year.
As a comparison, Black had a season that was extremely similar to that of a recognised gun in Jack Darling.
You seriously think Black's form in 2013 was near Carlisle's?
The poll results indicate the difference in exposed form between the three players
Yep. I think Carlisle will be the better footballer but I thought his 2013 was horribly overrated.
I thought his season was overrated as well but I think you are going to far with it. He was excellent at intercept marks and stood up in high pressure moments.
With the benefit of hindsight Essendon should have rotated Carlisle and Hooker as the number one defender and prevented Carlisle from burning out later in the year.
I'm not saying he had a terrible year, just that he wasn't any better than Black whose combination of goal kicking and tackling made him a serious contributor. I'd say Black was about the 10th-15th best key forward in the comp and Carlisle was about the 10th-15th best key defender.