Ive also heard he definitely isnt keen on leaving Adelaide
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very well said.I'm not looking for a reason to fault him, in fact if you look at the "favourite draft prospect" thread, on the T&T board, you'll see that he is the one I listed. You might have also noticed that I was the one that started this thread and began my write-up with "Been really keen on him for a few weeks."
If we draft him I reckon I'll be pumped (as long as we didn't think he had an attitude problem, or big head).
I was just wondering how you knew he was "as committed as the other top 20 prospects" though, as not many on here would be very familiar with all 20 and how committed they all are, to be able to make a call like that. The fact that you know him personally is a very good start though.
I don't think anyone is questioning his commitment to his footy, BTW, but more how well he will fit into a team environment, if he does happen to have a lot of tickets on himself, or something along those lines.
The very first guy I've heard that said his weakness is his team acts. Blocking, defence and general team orientated play.
Not sure how that will go down with recruiters and supporters, but it was good to hear something else other than the regular 'need to work on my tank' line.
Looks to go to the Next Level in his 2nd Season
Stagnated? He played great in the preseason, and only playing a quarter against Fremantle he was in our top 5. When Bucks starts making Fasolo/Dwyer the sub Kennedy should really shine.Seem's he has stagnated which is dissapointing. Sub again and really doesnt look like impacting a game unless Collingwood are on a role.
Stagnated? He played great in the preseason, and only playing a quarter against Fremantle he was in our top 5. When Bucks starts making Fasolo/Dwyer the sub Kennedy should really shine.
So you're saying even if he played well it's irrelevant because he was the sub?Yet he was still made sub. That is the issue.
So you're saying even if he played well it's irrelevant because he was the sub?
He came on when we were 60 points down, Laid a few tackles and got 10 or so disposals. He was one of the few who didn't butcher the ball and looked composed when he was being chased. He played well in his situation.Did he play well though? In the last when the game was over and Freo had the que in the rack he was rarely spotted.
He came on when we were 60 points down, Laid a few tackles and got 10 or so disposals. He was one of the few who didn't butcher the ball and looked composed when he was being chased. He played well in his situation.
Your point?Had one kick.......
Your point?
Even if you rate his game or not, he still had a great pre-season and a good 2013. He will be a good player for the Pies.
You do realise half our players butchered handballs too? I was saying he was clean with his disposal, which you can't deny.Well you lied basically when you posted he didnt butcher the ball. Unless you where being sarcastic.
You do realise half our players butchered handballs too? I was saying he was clean with his disposal, which you can't deny.
They were still applying much more pressure than the average team. Kennedy won't start sub against sydney and then you can see how good he actually instead of speculating stagnation after one game.Meh as I said the game was dead Freo where in cruise mode by then.