Best of the 2008 draft

Best of the 2008 draft

  • Nic Naitanui

    Votes: 53 19.7%
  • Hamish Hartlett

    Votes: 14 5.2%
  • Dayne Beams

    Votes: 69 25.7%
  • Stephen Hill

    Votes: 10 3.7%
  • Daniel Hannebery

    Votes: 46 17.1%
  • Tom Rockliff

    Votes: 46 17.1%
  • Daniel Rich

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • Steele Sidebottom

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • Rory Sloane

    Votes: 19 7.1%
  • David Zaharakis

    Votes: 7 2.6%

  • Total voters
    269

Remove this Banner Ad

That's not what I said, Griffen is our best player. But if I wanted to win a game tomorrow, then Minson would be the first player I would take from the Dogs.

The question posed in the OP is who's the best player, not who would you take first..
 

Log in to remove this ad.

An aggregate scoring table, done by a BF stats boffin, of 2008 draftees impact over each season since drafted showed NN ahead of Beams.

I think there is a reasonable argument that he has been the better player, if only marginally.
I like that graph, has it been updated for last year?
 
Can't deny the numbers Rockcliff gets but gee on Sunday he had it 40 times and Hill 26 and I know whose possessions I'd prefer. Hill hurts the opposition way more.
Hartlett has way bigger hurt factor too.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

That is terrible logic.

Beams, Sloane and Rockliff are all ahead of Hannebery ATM.

How do you figure that?

Hannebery is coming of an AA season, which came after a virtual Norm Smith performance in the 2012 GF.

Are you basing that "logic" purely on the past 10 weeks when Hanners was injured?

Because before that happened, he was playing better than all of them.
 
I like that graph, has it been updated for last year?

I believe D&M was talking about the graph made by AlibiMonday

I think this is the latest one
YiymdaA.png
 
I think a few went psst him when he really struggled to handle a tag early on.

Does he have to deal with tags now or do other Freo players generally cop them?
 
Forgive me, what is this graph trying to represent ?.

Games played, metres gained, effectiveness, leeriest boots ?.

Total output. It's a formula that's largely dependent on super coach scores over 75 per game. There are a few other allowances in the formula for things like games played, finals and tall players taking longer to develop.
 
Anyone who doesn't have Hannebery in their top 2 has no idea.
That means pretty much everyone has no idea. Whilst I am not saying Hannebery is not a top class player, its just others are ahead of him and I like a majority of others can't put him in the top 5.

1. Hartlett
2. Beams
3. Rockliff
4. Sloane
5. Hill
 
Back
Top