Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
they still couldLol...
"plead guilty and miss 4 weeks plus finals. We're not telling you what our case is, not will we reveal any of the evidence"
And the players told them to get ******???
Well I never...
ASADA... **** me.
No, more referring to the other deal the afl and Essendon discussed without ASADAs knowledge. Know it's in the wrong thread but it's kinda related! And in a way, rejecting offers could also stir the bear up don't you think?Not accepting a deal is poking the bear now? Wow.
That is a pretty interesting article:
So the offer sounds remarkably like the Cronulla deal. Except evidence wasn't provided.That is a pretty interesting article:
1) Caro suggests that the AFL & Club were not involved in the offer provided to players by ASADA- hard to see that the club was not told by the players.
2) ASADA told the players they have evidence that they took TB4- but unwittingly.
3) Players rejected the offer of the last 4 games of this season, finals if they made them and ready for round 1 next year as ASADA did not agree to show them the evidence.
4) AFLPA maybe stepping up by suggesting the players will be deciding how they will be proceeding in the matter in response to the proposed meeting between Little & Gil.
So the offer sounds remarkably like the Cronulla deal. Except evidence wasn't provided.
TBH I agree with the bombers here. If you truly believe you are innocent why taint your name and do a deal?
I am not sure if ASADA are doing the right thing here...
If ASADA think they are guilty and are satisfied with the evidence there should be no deal. Even if they have been duped they still took banned substances. There is no provision in the WADA code for duping. I keep hearing the only case someone got off is when they were under an anaesthetic and were given a banned substance without their permission.
So what's going on here? This is getting more bizarre by the moment!
How many Olympic athletes have had their bans backdated?Getting off is different to getting reduced or back dated bans.
How many Olympic athletes have had their bans backdated?
However he had all his victories and titles stripped. So he lost a lot!Alberto Contador did, served six months of a 2 year suspension. 18 months was backdated
I wonder when the term aggravated comes in to play? How many times do you poke the bear before it rips your ******* head off?
However he had all his victories and titles stripped. So he lost a lot!
If there is no punishment like that what are you achieving by backdating the punishment? How could this be a punishment for Essendon apart from staining their reputation?
To me they either have the evidence or they don't.
If they have good evidence most of the Essendon posters here have said they'll cop their wack.
If they don't have the evidence, they walk (no matter what we all might think).
Backdating bans to entice a guilty plea is bizarre to me, sorry!
It's bizarre to anyone. Cronulla boys saw their evidence and pretty much folded. Does that tell us anything?To me they either have the evidence or they don't.
If they have good evidence most of the Essendon posters here have said they'll cop their wack.
If they don't have the evidence, they walk (no matter what we all might think).
Backdating bans to entice a guilty plea is bizarre to me, sorry!