Brisbane v Carlton at Gabba 7:20pm

Remove this Banner Ad

"
The Round 22, 2007 match between Melbourne and Carlton, nicknamed the Kreuzer Cup, was the most controversial match in the tanking debate. It was the last match of the regular season, and both Melbourne and Carlton had a record of 4–17, meaning that whichever team won the match would lose the chance at a priority draft pick, and both clubs had already avoided the ignominy of the wooden spoon, as Richmond had secured it with a final record of 3–18–1. Overall, this meant that there was no benefit for either club to win, but a significant benefit to losing.

The stakes were particularly high in Carlton's case, because the club had also received a priority pick in the 2006 season; as such, if it lost this match, it would receive the No. 1 draft pick as its priority pick. In Melbourne's case, the priority pick it could have received would be the No. 18 pick; the No. 1 pick would go to wooden spooners Richmond if Melbourne lost the match. The match became known as the Kreuzer Cup, named after Northern Knights' ruckman Matthew Kreuzer, who had been expected to be (and was eventually, by Carlton) selected with the No. 1 pick in the 2007 AFL Draft."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priority_draft_pick
Huh. Weird since Richmond finished last.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Huh. Weird since Richmond finished last.

Yep, odd how it used to work, just glad we were able to take advantage before the AFL messed with it, Picks 1 and 2 were a Godsend way back when for us.
 
Yep, odd how it used to work, just glad we were able to take advantage before the AFL messed with it, Picks 1 and 2 were a Godsend way back when for us.
Carlton's fault we don't have Selwood. Changed the rule mid year the year of Gumby and Selwood, would have had pick 2 and 4 and gotten Selwood at 4 :mad:
 
Good for Brisbane but nobody can tell me they're a 10 goal better side than Carlton. Not after that first quarter anyway.
They are. Carlton are that bad.
 
Carlton's fault we don't have Selwood. Changed the rule mid year the year of Gumby and Selwood, would have had pick 2 and 4 and gotten Selwood at 4 :mad:

Wonder if Richmond would have taken Kreuzer had Carlton won that day. They took Cotchin at 2 instead so they potentially dodged a bullet.
2007 had Carlton won you would have moved to pick 5, and wonder if you still would have taken Myers or taken a punt of Jarrad Grant, or perhaps a youngster from the Falcons named Patrick in hindsight.
 
Still would take Murphy, Kreuzer, Gibbs, Cripps, Simpson, Henderson, Menzel and Jamison over Rockliff, D.Beams, Hanley, Martin, Merrett, Robinson and Christensen slightly.

Redden, Zorko, Rich, Mayes... We've got a good but young and experienced list. I don't think anyone in their right mind would take Carlton's list over Brisbane's.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wonder if Richmond would have taken Kreuzer had Carlton won that day. They took Cotchin at 2 instead so they potentially dodged a bullet.
2007 had Carlton won you would have moved to pick 5, and wonder if you still would have taken Myers or taken a punt of Jarrad Grant, or perhaps a youngster from the Falcons named Patrick in hindsight.
Or take Tambling over Franklin!!!!!
 
Or take Tambling over Franklin!!!!!

Heck both Franklin and Jordan Lewis were taken after Tambling so they messed up more then once on that.

Hawks had picks 2, 5 and 7 in that draft. What a way to build a team fast. Especially when all 3 turn out to be diamonds.
 
Wonder if Richmond would have taken Kreuzer had Carlton won that day. They took Cotchin at 2 instead so they potentially dodged a bullet.
2007 had Carlton won you would have moved to pick 5, and wonder if you still would have taken Myers or taken a punt of Jarrad Grant, or perhaps a youngster from the Falcons named Patrick in hindsight.
We would have taken Cotch at 1 but we would have been happy with either.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top