Vdubs
Hall of Famer
That's fine.Ok then Sydney were unlucky.
Either way I don't rate North as a genuine top 4 side.
They've finished top 4 now 2 years in a row.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
That's fine.Ok then Sydney were unlucky.
Either way I don't rate North as a genuine top 4 side.
Look at our record against the top 8 sides you will find it superior to any other sides.Very selective.
Hawthorn lost to Bombers, GWS, and Port twice, all outside top 8 teams- how could they possibly contend for a flag?
On the back of playing injury riddled sides in the semi finals both years.That's fine.
They've finished top 4 now 2 years in a row.
I wasn't serious about questioning Hawthorn's right to win a GF. It was in response to the losses NM had, yet finished top 4.Look at our record against the top 8 sides you will find it superior to any other sides.
Complacency was our biggest issue in most of those losses to sides outside the 8.
Maybe they had their own injuries in games they lost.They did beat you at Etihad in 2014, and could/should have got up in 2013. They are a very good team. Top 4. By definition.On the back of playing injury riddled sides in the semi finals both years.
TreloarCertainly possible.
Additions of Dangerfield, Henderson, Selwood and Smith that's 4 walk up starts pretty much and automatically make them better.
We will agree to disagree I think they are pretenders.Maybe they had their own injuries in games they lost.They did beat you at Etihad in 2014, and could/should have got up in 2013. They are a very good team. Top 4. By definition.
Fair enough.We will agree to disagree I think they are pretenders.
Plenty of teams are a threat to Hawthorn we have already lost 3 premiership players.Fair enough.
The are certainly little threat to Hawthorn, but which team isn't?
Maybe a rejuvenated Port, free of finals fatigue, and an easier draw?
Treloar
Howe
Nice inclusions there.
I'm backing Pies to go much further next year.
Hale- CeglarPlenty of teams are a threat to Hawthorn we have already lost 3 premiership players.
Can't stay top forever and our team is old.
Carlisle?Hale- Ceglar
Lake- Carlisle
Suckling- Hartung
They will be replaced.
Hale- Ceglar
Lake- Carlisle
Suckling- Hartung
They will be replaced.
Do you want him?Carlisle?
I think he is going to St Kilda.
Treloar
Howe
Nice inclusions there.
I'm backing Pies to go much further next year.
Unlikely.
Though Malcolm Turnbuckle is our current P.M. so anythings possible.
Footscray, West Coast & Port are the serious threats.
At the start of 2008 would you have believed that an over weight player who had been retired for a year could be the difference on grand final day?Always a beautiful kick- Hawks generally target those with that skill-set.
SS is not in that category, and in recent years, is a shadow of anything he used to be. Not an attractive prospect from this pov.
No, but, Would you have thought that Hawthorn would be the team to knock us off at the start of 08?At the start of 2008 would you have believed that an over weight player who had been retired for a year could be the difference on grand final day?
Plenty of teams are a threat to Hawthorn we have already lost 3 premiership players.
Can't stay top forever and our team is old.