bad setanta
Club Legend
- Oct 10, 2011
- 2,054
- 1,556
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #451
Ice is a serious drug
Lol, He say's this with a picture of Swan next to it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ice is a serious drug
Yeah good point. The Cats, Hawks and Swans have been smashing teams for a decade because they work harder.
Nothing to do with talent or development of players ability, they just want to win more than the other teams.
Ratten's "Talented but lazy" side was a kick away from the top 4. When he was sacked the message from Carlton was that Ratten had under performed and that the list was primed.
Mick came in, has cleared out half of that team, and is yet to lead the club to the finals. No, 2013 doesnt count because you fell into the 8 by default.
Face it - Your club thought it was buying a flag when it knifed a favorite son and appointed Mick Malthouse. Now it's all falling apart and the club has no idea how to handle it from a list management or PR perspective.
If Mick had stayed at Collingwood then Ratten would never have been turfed.
Now he is a back to back flag winning assistant, in charge of rebuilding a Hawks midfield around the likes of Lewis, Hill, Smith, Suckling and Whitecross.
But your stance isnt that those players are talented or that Ratten has developed them, no no, those guys just wanted it more and worked harder than Kennedy, Parker, Hannerbury, Boak, Cornes, Polec, Selwood, Bartel, Kelly etc. through the finals.
what a load of s**t. No idea how to handle it? Err, bringing in fan favourites (e.g. Silvagni) and selling the young guys as our future for PR, and a clear ******* rebuild for the list management. We weren't quite s**t enough to get Petracca/McCartin this year, so we looked at increasing depth and building a base of young players. Pretty clear.Yeah good point. The Cats, Hawks and Swans have been smashing teams for a decade because they work harder.
Nothing to do with talent or development of players ability, they just want to win more than the other teams.
Ratten's "Talented but lazy" side was a kick away from the top 4. When he was sacked the message from Carlton was that Ratten had under performed and that the list was primed.
Mick came in, has cleared out half of that team, and is yet to lead the club to the finals. No, 2013 doesnt count because you fell into the 8 by default.
Face it - Your club thought it was buying a flag when it knifed a favorite son and appointed Mick Malthouse. Now it's all falling apart and the club has no idea how to handle it from a list management or PR perspective.
If Mick had stayed at Collingwood then Ratten would never have been turfed.
Now he is a back to back flag winning assistant, in charge of rebuilding a Hawks midfield around the likes of Lewis, Hill, Smith, Suckling and Whitecross.
But your stance isnt that those players are talented or that Ratten has developed them, no no, those guys just wanted it more and worked harder than Kennedy, Parker, Hannerbury, Boak, Cornes, Polec, Selwood, Bartel, Kelly etc. through the finals.
No to virtually everyone one of those and we've been waiting for Kreuzer for an eternity now.
Its the asterix that is detailed at the bottom of the 2013 ladder records on the AFL website. The explanation at the bottom reads something like - "Carlton Football Club made finals after Essendon was removed from the top eight for bringing the game into disrepute and after finishing NINTH on points for the year Carlton were gifted a finals appearance to make up the numbers."
The reason the general public think the club lack direction is probably due to your president at the time, sticks, sat at a media conference to introduce malthouse as the new coach and said that the boaard felt that they had a list good enough to challenge for a flag and they felt that they needed a coach that knew how to get them there. Malthoude himself stated during both pre-seasons that thelist was ok but they just needed a re-jig in gameplan plan to bemore defencive mineded. Now we want to hail them for their good work on changing over haalf the list. I still can't get how supporters have copped all this on the chin?
If I swapped Cripps to v Adams, that's the only one I think we have at the moment and that's because Adams is a ball butcherer. In every other KPI Adams is ahead. Not a great comparison
Mate carlton aren't on the same level. Peo
ple bringing up the game against sydney to say where no good and we were lucky to make finals. For starters do you think carlton when the heat was on could of gone to adelaide and perth and beating teams challenging for the same spot? With the players sydney rested im still confident to say carlton wouldnt of beaten them. Im not saying where a great side either. Just know where ahead of carlton.
You do realise nobody here needs to focus on our own club because it's not like we are coaches or players.
It's a discussion forum
For starter, right now Cripps is not a better player than Adams, he might have more potential but he isn't better.
Second of all, Adams ball use is fine when he is played in the middle. Its just when he plays in the wing or in the backline it was a problem.
Hang on I thought Buckley said he is a good kick he just can't replicate on game day because his not used to playing in front of large crowds and gets nervous.
To say Carlton have no up n' coming youngsters is laughable
And the rest? They are the best 5 really aren't they besides Docherty and this years draftees? Cripps and Menzel any club would love. The rest I'm not so sure.To say Carlton have no up n' coming youngsters is laughable
Cripps: averages 23 disposals, 0.7 goals, 5 tackles in VFL
Graham: averages 28 disposals, 1 goal, 7 tackles, 5 marks in VFL
Whiley: average 30 disposals, 1 goal, 4 tackles, 6 marks in NEAFL
Just to name a few.
Both Buckley & Menzel earning a rising star nomination
It might only be the reserves but those are impressive stats that show a lot of promise.
What round did Buckley say that?
Not sure where he said it. Was definitely post season maybe at that fan forum. But it's definitely something his used to defend Adams kicking.
As much as it was cold( buy a coat) I loved watching footy there. Its like level 2 at the mcg/Etihad all around the ground.Waverly was a terrible place to visit as a spectator for footy in the 70's and 80's, albeit our success of the times. Went to a tonne of games out there and rarely with a smile on my face because it was half frozen and I was squinting through the drizzle.
Take a wander out there now though, you wouldn't recognize the place. Yeh, the stand that was kept is a great hulking ugly piece of concrete, but they re-worked the interior so it is super bright and airy and spacious for the team to train in.
Outside, the oval is now surrounded by very attractive townhomes and the wind no longer seems to sweep in with the surrounding land re-developed with homes and such.
Even so, the HFC is considering its future with a mind to new facilities that will take us into the next 50 years.
We don't stand still at Hawthorn, and are not too ashamed to recognize our warts and do something about them.
To your second question, currently Adam Simpson at the West Coast Eagles, Damian Hardwick at Richmond, Leon Cameron at the Giants, and Luke Beveridge at Footscray were all assistant coaches under Clarko at Hawthorn DIRECTLY before being hired as senior coaches at their current clubs.
Sure we played crap early on but no injuries to speak of either during that time. And I love the analogy of all 9 games were gifted to us. Sure whatever you reckon.Richmond were hardly better then Carlton until that 9 game streak against crap opposition with Sydney resting their best players in the last round.
Obviously they got shown up when Richmond met Port in the finals and went 46-0 before hitting the scoreboard.
I would also add, commentators fans etc base their ladder predictions on out of date data. Some are relevant but a lot of the time teams improve/decline in a non linear fashion.also when people try to predict the season based on how the ladder ended up. that's almost the worst for mine. "how will A get into the top 4 when B, C, D and E are locks?" no they're not locks you jabroni, everyone starts on 0 points!!
That's what you don't get mate.
There is no Hodge, there is no 08' or 13' or 14' without me and a whole heap of me's.
Because our club nearly disappeared into a dark navy and red yoked jumper and if it wasn't for the supporters at a certain town hall there are no cups after 91'.
But you've got no idea mate, so keep on trying.
And at Hawthorn we don't look for club success to provide supporter visions of accomplishment.
It just brings us regular, and ongoing enjoyment.
Cheers.
Did i arrive too late for the bag a blue party? The only fans i see getting excited about carlton next year are carlton fans. In my opinion they are quite a delusional bunch.
Yes of coarse coming from a melbourne supporter, but im expecting us to win seven games...and finish above the blues
Yeah you've got to stop this crap mate - makes you look very foolish.
Ah Ok, I'll just do what you and monkey man want...pfffffh.