It would make sense. We wouldn't want the current monogram on it's own with the Heritage monogram on our jumpers... (as much as it's leaning towards that)...So are they going to return the old style logo as well (150 year logo)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would make sense. We wouldn't want the current monogram on it's own with the Heritage monogram on our jumpers... (as much as it's leaning towards that)...So are they going to return the old style logo as well (150 year logo)?
Every thread about a major design change needs a narrow-minded comment of that ilk.Imac pls we know that already.
From their site: "So what's it going to be? Our current CFC emblem, or return to our iconic heritage CFC crest that adorned our 'old dark navy blue' guernseys for 70 years, including 11 Premierships"
I'm sure Carlton will will appreciate heritage input from fans of the WCE franchise who can't even figure their club colours out, and zero-premiership Freo who've just ditched their guernsey, colours and logo.As lmach said though, pretty rubbish club from top to toe.
beef?I'm sure Carlton will will appreciate heritage input from fans of the WCE franchise who can't even figure their club colours out, and zero-premiership Freo who've just ditched their guernsey, colours and logo.
Now, now. Maybe Carlton will be relevant again one day.I'm sure Carlton will will appreciate heritage input from fans of the WCE franchise who can't even figure their club colours out, and zero-premiership Freo who've just ditched their guernsey, colours and logo.
Not so much, but fans of those two clubs in particular have no business calling anyone rubbish from a branding point of view. Sydney fans have a stronger position to comment frombeef?
Sydney fans have a stronger position to comment from
Sure, and thanks for asking so politely.May I ask why?
Our opinions matter just as much as any other posters on this board. Don't knock the club.
You're right, and I over-reacted to lmach's comment, but I think if you want to write off a club "from top to toe" in a branding discussion you should make sure your own club hasn't changed your colours to sell more polo shirts...As lmach said though, pretty rubbish club from top to toe.
It's not like anyone on this board was involved in those decisions, in fact, several posters here disagree, and vehemently refute, several of the recent branding decisions by some of the clubs. There's no need to act all high and mighty, we're all just weirdos who like merchandise and colours in the end...[...]in a branding discussion you should make sure your own club hasn't changed your colours to sell more polo shirts...
nah, doubt itNow, now. Maybe Carlton will be relevant again one day.
Given it's the 17th, do we know the result?
I noticed in the video that they didn't use the CFCC monogram (Cricket and footy club).The voting process has only just got underway. There's a website to accompany it – how slick does this look? I love it. The Blues certainly have a lot of history. Despite barracking for Collingwood, they're not a team I really hate. There are a couple of clubs that are much worse.
http://selectourguernsey.com.au
Also note to Mero in that 'time warp' style video all the different monogram varieties throughout the 1933–1997 period! I think the way you have it is best though, because there wasn't really a standardised version up until the early 80s really