CAS - 12JAN2016- EFC will learn if they got away with it - Zellenleiter Goddard will remain angry

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lance Uppercut said:
Except that in our case Jon Snow has blond hair and he really is dead, and hopefully this is the last season ;)
Click to expand...
That red witch will get her gear off and work some magic
Proper Gander said:
Am I the only person here checking in daily in order to see what todays thread title change is? Outstanding work, Percel
Click to expand...
Darth Albert is dead dead dead. He does appear as one of those JEDI ghostly things on the Essendon board though. They still see the good in him
 

Log in to remove this ad.

QuietB said:
The only sources for those three years has been the AFL and/or Essendon acting somewhat cooperatively to generally the same goals.

It is the football equivalent of asking Putin to report on the Malaysian Airlines Ukraine incident.

Any statement along the lines of "lack of convincing proof" is a 100% guess.
Click to expand...
Id say the lack of a guilty finding after 3 years makes it less than a pure guess
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

good4footy said:
Age reporting that Bomber players were asked to attend and be cross examined by CAS not Essendon or WADA.
Click to expand...
The relevant players — who included skipper Jobe Watson — were informed they would be called to give evidence well in advance of the hearing. The players separately gave evidence over two days of the five-day hearing, in which WADA appealed the AFL tribunal's not guilty verdict for the 34 players from earlier this year.


The CAS has already received submissions from the parties on any sentencing in the event of WADA's appeal being successful and the players found guilty of taking TB-4.

This means that the players would be sentenced immediately if WADA wins on appeal. There would be no subsequent hearing to determine sanctions.

The players, who were interviewed at length by ASADA during the joint investigation with the AFL, were not asked to testify at the much longer AFL anti-doping tribunal hearing that saw the players cleared on the eve of the 2015 season.

Because the CAS's three-member panel had read submissions and other material prior to the hearing, the panel - chaired by distinguished English QC and human rights lawyer Michael Beloff - were able to complete the entire appeal hearing within five days.



Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...to-hearing-20151125-gl7t2e.html#ixzz3sUpVaEhG
Follow us: @theage on Twitter | theageAustralia on Facebook
 
When are reporters going to actually read the WADA code

"Players can also reduce a penalty by six months if they demonstrate co-operation"

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...to-hearing-20151125-gl7t2e.html#ixzz3sUy19dHh
Follow us: @theage on Twitter | theageAustralia on Facebook

This only applies if they help prosecute someone else.... since they keep saying they know nothing how can they achieve this? Even if some knew something unlikely all 34 could each provide seperate assistance.
 
Muggs said:
When are reporters going to actually read the WADA code...
Click to expand...
Bahaha. They have had 2 years and 10 months to do that. They arent going to start now.
 
Percel said:
No, just no

Prima was a no no for the lunch box, that s**t aint real.
Click to expand...
Screw you man.

Primas and cheese sticks, in and around my mouth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

CASEYS9420
Moved Thread James Hird - is it time to give him a second chance at coaching an AFL club? Gil says yes! - The PEDs Forum Version
2 3 4
Replies
88
Views
6K
Caligo
Caligo

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top