- Feb 1, 2013
- 5,435
- 9,555
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors
They would be my changes too. Sub Sam Gray, let young play a full game I reckon.OUT: Hombsch, Impey
IN: Clurey, Wingard
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They would be my changes too. Sub Sam Gray, let young play a full game I reckon.OUT: Hombsch, Impey
IN: Clurey, Wingard
"Wingard will play, but we're going to lose Jack Hombsch to some hamstring soreness," Hinkley said.
"We're not taking any risks with Hombschy, in the same way we didn't with Chad last week.
"I suspect there'll only be one change."
http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/2014-04-17/wingard-confirmed-to-face-eagles
Booooo.
We had our structures looking good earlier in the season. But last week we dropped Butcher for Sam Gray, and now this week we lose Hombsch and replace him with Wingard? Kern, nobody wants to see the return of last year's midget line-up, especially not against the Weagles. If Hombsch is out, Butch or Clurey should come in to replace him and somebody like Impey should go out for Wingard.
Booooo.
We had our structures looking good earlier in the season. But last week we dropped Butcher for Sam Gray, and now this week we lose Hombsch and replace him with Wingard? Kern, nobody wants to see the return of last year's midget line-up, especially not against the Weagles. If Hombsch is out, Butch or Clurey should come in to replace him and somebody like Impey should go out for Wingard.
Booooo.
We had our structures looking good earlier in the season. But last week we dropped Butcher for Sam Gray, and now this week we lose Hombsch and replace him with Wingard? Kern, nobody wants to see the return of last year's midget line-up, especially not against the Weagles. If Hombsch is out, Butch or Clurey should come in to replace him and somebody like Impey should go out for Wingard.
Fairplay, no one mentioned 4 talls lol. Haven't paid attention to West Coast this year much myself.Based on last weeks West Coast lineup (and assuming NicNat plays, and Cox starts in the ruck).
Jonas - Kennedy (no thanks)
Stewart - Darling (no thanks)
or O'Shea - Darling
Trengove - Naitinui
Carlile - Lycett
They've had similar forward structure, playing either Sinclair or Lycett, each week.
I much prefer:
Carlile - Kennedy
Jonas - Darling
Trengove - Naitinui
Clurey - Lycett
Yeh, there's no doubt we've got word he's not playing. Be interesting to see who our emergencies are though.Maybe Phil Walsh still has some loyal spies at West Coast and he doesn't think Nic Nat will play.
I think the emergencies will be Butch, Stewart and Moore. Probably makes more sense to have some height as back up rather than smalls for this one. Though I like your suggestion of Newton.I'm guessing Hitchcock, Butcher and Newton
West Coast have a ton of talls would be worried if we go in with only 2 KPFs and 2 KPDs
O'Shea being in covers Hombsch I'm thinking Ken is thinking, and after all the mail over here in WA the Eagles won't play 3 ruckman against our runners.If that's true Bobby and Jacko can cover Kennedy and Darling with Jonas being the 3rd tall defender if required.Makes perfect sense when ya look at it.Nic Nat the more n more I'm hearing won't play but I won't be surprised to see him named with West Coast taking a wait n see approach.I can see us winning similar to the Carlton game when we got pushed hard for 3 quarters then got away to be honest.
Maybe Phil Walsh still has some loyal spies at West Coast and he doesn't think Nic Nat will play.