- Jul 10, 2012
- 3,155
- 1,932
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Banned
- #1,976
Let's say hypothetically Hird cops the sack sometime this season
Better damn not be hypothetical
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's say hypothetically Hird cops the sack sometime this season
Hope so too but we know how stubborn the board has been over the last 2 yearsBetter damn not be hypothetical
Listen to Hird, Heppel and Watson.
just had a listen to Hird and Jobe. What were you referring to with the white flag comment?. All sounded like fluff to me.
Yeh. Well, we won't be adding to that for a while.I just noticed on the side banner all the premierships you've won. Pretty cool feature.
Some saying Hird should be sacked before the end of the season. With all the question marks over our credibility and integrity of our club over the last 2 or 3 years lets at least honour Hird's contract. Come on.
Mark Harvey should be given a try.
Some saying Hird should be sacked before the end of the season. With all the question marks over our credibility and integrity of our club over the last 2 or 3 years lets at least honour Hird's contract. Come on.
I agree. I believe Hird is on the last straw. One more bad loss and he will be out the door. Melbourne game very important to his coaching futureHird won't be sacked this week unfortunately, if we get smashed by Melbourne which we will, I fully expect Hird to be sacked before that Monday.
There's nothing to be gained at all.
Our season is over, Hird's career beyond this is on the line over the next two weeks however.
No coach worth having would be willing to come to this club whilst the supplement rubbish remains unresolved. Anything other than staying the course is pointless until then.One week down and the verdict so far is... comfortably satisfied he is not the man for the job.
Would pay him out, install Bassett while conducting a comprehensive search for the best candidate using similar criteria to that proposed by Lord Nicholson