The NMFC round table discussion doesn't load for me.
Why must life toy with me like this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
The 2 min 54 sec one should, the 10 min is the subscription one.The NMFC round table discussion doesn't load for me.
Why must life toy with me like this?
I was surprise to hear Gerard Healy say Jmac struggles with his decision making when under pressure.
The 2 min 54 sec one should, the 10 min is the subscription one.
Bruce and Dennis l believe enjoy calling our games, l don't mind them so much. Huddo, Dennis and Leigh Matthews for me.
Dwayne Russell's voice has always given me the shits...even if he had great things to say I'd probably still refuse to listen based on the grating voice of his. Brian Taylor is downright crap, Bruce was once great but now is past his use-by date, likewise with Cometti. Luke Darcy is garbage.
Anthony Hudson I don't mind, Drew Morphett was fantastic and I think now finds himself without a gig.....yet Brian Taylor still does. Go figure. Clinton Grybas was brilliant, and Sandy Roberts is great too.
The sad thing is that the s**t commentators outweigh the great ones by a country mile.
I was surprise to hear Gerard Healy say Jmac struggles with his decision making when under pressure.
The NMFC round table discussion doesn't load for me.
Why must life toy with me like this?
Try opening the page that the videos on in an incognito window. It should work then regardless of whether you have a subscription or not.The 2 min 54 sec one should, the 10 min is the subscription one.
Didn't know that thanks, I've been tinkering with hola over the nab series as well, very useful.Try opening the page that the videos on in an incognito window. It should work then regardless of whether you have a subscription or not.
No worries. I've got no idea what hola is, care to inform me?Didn't know that thanks, I've been tinkering with hola over the nab series as well, very useful.
Yep Agree great viewing mentioned all our Best Players new recruits etc Question mark on the backline.....but one player they talked about being an X Factor if he can take the next step is Atley...
Basically changes ip address to any country, so netflix and any American sites that would only work in the USA now works with it, just a plugin near any internet browser sidebar.No worries. I've got no idea what hola is, care to inform me?
You beauty, beauty.I'm a member mate. How do I give you an invite code?
100% spot on MM - Ralphy is the biggest WayneKerr of them all!!Only a small thing, but has anyone else noticed that both Lindsay Thomas and Majak Daw have ceased to have a surname. They are almost always referred to a "Lindsay Thomas" and "Majak Daw" instead of just "Thomas" and "Daw." It's like there is someone else with their surnames in the team...except there isn't. It's like their the David Villas of the AFL. Almost every commentator is guilty of it, but Dwayne never goes with just the surname. Only a small thing but it's as annoying as hell. It'd be a good drinking game if only Majak Daw got the ball more often...
I heard a good conversation on SEN with Rohan Connolly last weekend. He was basically saying that the problem is that there were simply too many journos/commentators for whom covering the footy was just their job - they liked the game but weren't really passionate about it. Also, the number of media meant that each one had to scramble to 'find' a story to get ahead of the others. Hence, beat-ups, exaggerations, misunderstandings and flagrant untruths.
Which leads me to Jon Ralph. "The Buzz" (what a crock) is the chief hack an a world of hacks. If you can ever stand it, just listen to what he says about football. In no time you'll realise he knows jack s**t about it. He employs one of the same three strategies I employ when someone brings up a topic of conversation with me that I've heard about, but don't care enough or aren't smart enough to know the details.
It's not like he's even got a good journalistic writing style. I pick on him a bit, but I think he exemplifies everything wrong with footy journalism.
- State the obvious but overblow it to sound like you being forthright.
- Take a simplistic stand on a complex issue without ever properly examining it.
- Over-analyse or reiterate a more simple issue just to try sound like you know more about it than you do.
As for TV coverage...
- Less is more. 2 callers, 1 comment, 1 on the boundary. That's it. Just because more people are talking doesn't mean more is being said.
- Just call the game. Don't talk amongst yourselves about anything.
- People are watching because of the game - not you. Drop the catchphrases, cliches, phony excitement and promoting how great the other commentators are.
- Keep it simple. "War Rooms", guys parroting stats that sound analytical but mean nothing to the viewer and the belief that every moment of the game is the result of some pre-ordained plan are plain boring.
- Shut up. If you have a choice between saying it in a dozen words or 50 words. Go the dozen every time,
maybe the solution in the Backline is Hansen actually playing on their key forward
Great point, there was no coincidence between Hansens good form and lower opposition scores, ie freo game, they had no idea how to score.I think Brown nailed it when he said Hansen doesn't play like a key defender. Hansen is probably one of our most important defenders due to his ability to intercept mark, that is because when it comes to 1v1 marking contests the likes of Grima, Firrito and Thompson leak a lot of goals, especially against power forwards. They are just too small to hold up physically. Both Thompson and Grima can be good one weak, shithouse the next, and a lot depends on if Hansen is at CHB forcing the delivery to go wide and indirect. We just concede way too many marks inside our defensive 50, especially uncontested marks.
Great point, there was no coincidence between Hansens good form and lower opposition scores, ie freo game, they had no idea how to score.
Plus the positioning when the opposition are on the rebound by Hansen is first class, reads the ball and play extraordinarily well.When they talked about us getting sodomised in the finals by big forwards, they didn't highlight that Hansen was missing from those games. This allowed the opposition to go right up the corridor and it killed us.
I do think we need two big key defenders who are more capable of reducing the number of marks their opponent gets, then when someone like Hansen is available then that supply will be constricted a lot further. Without Hansen around I thought Tippett and Tarrant held up okay as key defenders in the practice matches.
The problem is we wont be able to field Tarrant/Tippett/Hansen/Thompson/Firrito in the same back line, once the ball hits the ground we would be cactus.
Getting smashed in the middle was the main factor in this so called sodomisation.When they talked about us getting sodomised in the finals by big forwards, they didn't highlight that Hansen was missing from those games. This allowed the opposition to go right up the corridor and it killed us.
I do think we need two big key defenders who are more capable of reducing the number of marks their opponent gets, then when someone like Hansen is available then that supply will be constricted a lot further. Without Hansen around I thought Tippett and Tarrant held up okay as key defenders in the practice matches.
The problem is we wont be able to field Tarrant/Tippett/Hansen/Thompson/Firrito in the same back line, once the ball hits the ground we would be cactus.
This, Jmac is one of our best decision makers.I don't think Atley's decision making is poor, it's his execution that lets him down. A lot of this has to do with running at pace but I also believe his kicking mechanics aren't as natural as others. Whereas Wright has a very good kick but chooses the wrong option occasionally. Healy's mention of J Mac having poor decision making just confused me, I think it was just convenient to group them all together.