Seriously need to rest some players after that match...
maybe Foley as sub...and bring in helbig and llyod...
rest Ivan and bring in the bigo
What are we, sitting on top of the ladder two games clear?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seriously need to rest some players after that match...
maybe Foley as sub...and bring in helbig and llyod...
rest Ivan and bring in the bigo
Lennon will be out. Not ready, if he stays in will get the Nick name fumbles.
1) don't flirt with form
2) every game is potentially our last (that means something), we get no second chances, so selection must reflect this
3) saints will be out to kill our party, we have to take them seriously
4) conca for Lennon on form
5) apparently Jacko wasn't great in the vfl, so another week for him
6) you don't experiment with a previously failed three talls forward structure in elimination games. If Ty gets a game , it will be IMO only off the back of a drop in form of griff
your comments are dumb and short sighted. griff needs to find his niche as a true chf, playing a role where hitting the scoreboard is not the be all and end all. get 1 or 2 a game whilst delivering it quick and very long do beat the double team whilst jack and vickers lead to opposing pockets. this pre season alot work needs to go into those 3 clicking. atm a 3 tall forward line isnt as effective as it should be cos we are 1 genuine crumber short to truely complement kpp talent we possessHe doesnt, but when vickery doesnt kick goals, hes just a burden. When griff doesnt, hes still useful.
Can't take credit. Groupie_ came up with the idea.
Kicks more goals and is a better ruckman. Only thing that Griffiths has over Vickery at the moment is his contested marking.Griff has done enough to keep Vickery out. More versatile than Vickery, longer kick than Vickery, better mark than Vickery and can play CHB and pinch Ruck if he isn't kicking goals and I believe has a bigger X factor than Vickery, and if Vickery isn't kicking goals, he has no impact on the game where as Griff still does....... just curious, how did Vickery get a game in front of Griff again?
Disagree. Griff does fine in the ruck.Kicks more goals and is a better ruckman. Only thing that Griffiths has over Vickery at the moment is his contested marking.
Batchelor? I think Gordo with his tank, he leap and speed is going to be a good player for us so he stays for me.I think Jake gets fit enough over summer he play that role Gordon does now, just wander around the forward half making a menace of himself and setting up goals, his field kicking is really really really good. I'd love to have Vickery (or lids/cotch/martin) out of the square and have Jack just float across the front Fyfe styles.
It may mean a tall goes out at the back, and those mids rest there too. Much to do, to get the mix right, if ever.Griff and Vickery , in the same side makes it hard to use Cotchin , Lids , Martin and Titch forward.
He attacks the ball and the man better imo.Disagree. Griff does fine in the ruck.
Maybe but i love Batch's physicality. Think its been an important part of our turn around.Batchelor? I think Gordo with his tank, he leap and speed is going to be a good player for us so he stays for me.
I think that Griffiths performs the role well, but Vickery, who has played more of his football career in the position, is better at rucking. Also, when playing second fiddle to Maric, Vickery has averaged more hitouts, possessions, clearances and goals than Griffiths. That said, it is hard to effectively use statistics as evidence as the percentage for time played in ruck is unavailable.Disagree. Griff does fine in the ruck.