Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Libba
Stat comparisons with that drug addled hack.
What a joke.
You're right.Liberatore, a hack?
Come on now.
I'm not sure Cripps was ever fat and slow and at risk of being delisted.
Cripps is bigger version of Jobe Watson, isnt he? Better hands than Watson.
Cool, he's widely viewed as being one of the better young mids in the comp.. he isn't underrated.FWIW, champion data applies the tag 'most underated in the comp' to the bont. They have some kind of formula that they apply to every involvement in play that a player has that supposedly measures their influence on a game, how they use it, whether that interaction wins the ball or merely applies defensive pressure or whatever - if they cough it up or butcher it they get -ve points. Its still just a stat, but if you are going to use stats at all, those would be the ones to use.
By their measure, Bont is 11th in the comp with 5xx points. The only other youngster in the top 20 is Wingard at number 20 - all the rest are the seasoned elite veterans of the comp such as Pendles, Danger, Fyfe, etc... I think Cripps came in around 2xx points, but Im not sure of the overall comp postition that gave him
No but Watson did turn into a gigantic clearance beast before it was fashionable.
He reminds me of Pendlebury in that regard, as he always seems to have time - even in congestion and has that ability to open up play with a little shimmy or side step.Bont is slow as a wet week over the the first 5 meters, but he is slippery and he knows when to go.
I really think that's Bont's best comparison in general, except maybe trade out a bit of Kouta's power for some extra class from Bont.And I'd say for Bont's best Carlton comparison you'd probably have to go back to Koutoufides.
Both outside the typical moulds, physically and stylistically. It's a little hard to predict what sort of player Bont will evolve into, whereas Cripps seems to have a more defined projected career arc as a topline contested mid.
Better hands and a better attitude.Cripps is bigger version of Jobe Watson, isnt he? Better hands than Watson.
In terms of influencing a game Bontompelli is the more apt comparison. His vision, ability to create, mobility, marking and the threat he provides up forward is more akin to Bontompelli than Liberatore.And I'd say for Bont's best Carlton comparison you'd probably have to go back to Koutoufides.
Both outside the typical moulds, physically and stylistically. It's a little hard to predict what sort of player Bont will evolve into, whereas Cripps seems to have a more defined projected career arc as a topline contested mid.
Plus he's allowed to play this year which is a distinct advantage.Better hands and a better attitude.
I think that last paragraph hits the nail on the head. They are both what their respective clubs need. We need a Cripps at this point more than we need a Bont. The dogs however need a Bont more than a Cripps.Both are genuine young guns, I love watching Bont play and I obviously love watching young Cripps play. I agree with Azul in that Cripps still has some things to work on and I would have to say the Bont is the better player with match winning abilities at this stage.
Love Cripps though and he is exactly the right type of player we need with where we are at the moment.
Cripps is bigger version of Jobe Watson, isnt he? Better hands than Watson.
Cripps is more physical and athletic than Watson imo. His best comparison is a bigger version of Kennedy imo
I think the Bont is wasted at CHF to be honest - his strengths include his inside ability, release by hand and winning the ball in general play.Probably more a question to the Dogs supporters, but wonder if The Bont would have been viewed an average sized CHF 15 years ago? Has that incredible core strength, breaks tackles, reads the game really well and knows where the goals are.
I think the Bont is wasted at CHF to be honest - his strengths include his inside ability, release by hand and winning the ball in general play.
Basically he's a decent CHF or an excellent midfielder, and you back 'excellent' over 'decent' any day of the week.
Stringer on the other hand...
Cripps is bigger version of Jobe Watson, isnt he? Better hands than Watson.