Dayne Zorko vs Luke Dahlhaus

[Dom PC]

Pretty interesting comparison, they are a similar size and have similar attributes (I'd say Zorko is quicker across the ground though). Overall, I'd have Zorko ahead of Dahlhaus. but I am bias of course. What does everyone else think?

Nothing like some stats to look at http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...1=3556&tid2=20&pid2=3631&type=A&fid1=C&fid2=C

 

[TheHoneyBadger]

I think at this stage they're almost inseparable in terms of what they offer their respective teams.

Zorko's a touch quicker, but Dahlhaus is a few years younger (and obviously plays for my club), so I'll go with Lukey D.

The Brisbane mosquito fleet is to be feared, though.

 

[Jaeger]

Dahlhaus is one of my favourite non-Hawthorn players but I think Zorko's got him covered.

 

[cotter101]

Love watching Daulhaus. One of my favorite opposition players. But I think Zorko has him covered.

 

[The_Flying_Egg]

Zorko is currently better, but I would rather Dahl as he is 3 and a half years younger

 

[TN25]

I think Zorko is better but in a few years it may be a different story

 

[timtamWB]

Zorko is better at the moment, as for in the future? It could go either way, but Dahl has been pretty damn good for a rookie selection.

 

[KissKiss]

Zorko because he leads the hitout stats

 

[blitzer]

If Dahlhaus had better disposal and was a bit bigger/stronger he'd be an amazing player but as it stands Zorko is probably a fair bit better.